Proceedings of the International Conference on Biomedical Electronics and Devices 2015
DOI: 10.5220/0005286002040209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System for Posture Evaluation and Correction - Development of a Second Prototype for an Intelligent Chair

Abstract: The sitting position has become one of the most common postures in developed countries. However, assuming a poor sitting posture leads to several health problems, namely back, shoulder and neck pain. In a previous work, an intelligent chair was developed and was shown to classify and correct the seating position. This work describes improvements on this intelligent chair prototype culminating with the development of a new prototype. The improvements of this new prototype are presented, resulting in new studies… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason we used the default values from the fitctree function but changing the splitting criterion (Gini and Twoing), as shown in Table III. TABLE III. RESULTS FROM THE AUTOMATIC SEPRATION BASED ON CLASSIFICATION TREES This would mean that for an automatic optimization we would get a 87.1% overall classification (0.890*0.9790 = 0.871), which is still a 6.2% improvement over the previously reported result of 80.9% score for 12 standard sitting postures [28]. When the user is identified with the Android application, we have an 8.1% classification optimization.…”
Section: Classification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For this reason we used the default values from the fitctree function but changing the splitting criterion (Gini and Twoing), as shown in Table III. TABLE III. RESULTS FROM THE AUTOMATIC SEPRATION BASED ON CLASSIFICATION TREES This would mean that for an automatic optimization we would get a 87.1% overall classification (0.890*0.9790 = 0.871), which is still a 6.2% improvement over the previously reported result of 80.9% score for 12 standard sitting postures [28]. When the user is identified with the Android application, we have an 8.1% classification optimization.…”
Section: Classification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The data of the participants in the experiment, namely, Sex, Age, Weight and Height is presented in Table 1. In that protocol [28], we showed the postures P1 to P12 (as seen in figure 2), each for a duration of 20 seconds, asking the subject to mimic each posture, as in a previous protocol [27], which were based on the most familiar postures observed in office environments [1]- [4], [6], [30]. We used a sampling rate of 8 Hz and took 100 time-points (corresponding to 12.5 seconds out of 20 for each posture), and divided them in maps of 20 pressure acquisitions.…”
Section: B Experimental Setup -Participants and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The second prototype was built in order to overcome the gaps identified in the first prototype, mainly the introduction of a vacuum pump to control efficiently the air inside the bladders, the design of industrially constructed air bladders and the reorganization of the communication protocols (Pereira et al, 2015). We then revised our classification and correction algorithms and introduced Fuzzy Logic to the existing ANN algorithms, which was able to integrate time spent in each posture (recognized by the ANN) and was able to identify intermediate postures, other than the 12 standard ones and correct them based on fuzzy logic actuators .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%