2009 American Control Conference 2009
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2009.5160239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System identification of an interacting series process for real-time model predictive control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This results in the simulation errors not only for upstream outputs but also for downstream outputs, since the upstream variables affects the downstream variables directly, and vice versa. When (18) is used as the model structure to predict the output of the downstream variable, such nonlinearities in the upstream is detected by the upstream sensor or transmitter, and is used as one of the model inputs. In the same way, when (17) is used to predict the upstream variable, such nonlinearities affects first the downstream variable, then is detected by downstream sensor or transmitter, and further be used as one of the model inputs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This results in the simulation errors not only for upstream outputs but also for downstream outputs, since the upstream variables affects the downstream variables directly, and vice versa. When (18) is used as the model structure to predict the output of the downstream variable, such nonlinearities in the upstream is detected by the upstream sensor or transmitter, and is used as one of the model inputs. In the same way, when (17) is used to predict the upstream variable, such nonlinearities affects first the downstream variable, then is detected by downstream sensor or transmitter, and further be used as one of the model inputs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wibowo et al [18] considered the problem of developing a linear model from the input-output data that have the relation as given above, which can be explained as follows:…”
Section: Model Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a drawback of the methods used is that the physical insight of the process in the models is lost, which is characteristic of a black-box model. Wibowo et al 61 developed a MIMO state-space model from input–output data using a linear system identification technique. The subspace identification method using the N4SID algorithm was proposed as a more suitable method for a gaseous pilot plant than Prediction Error Methods (PEM), as indicated by smaller identification and validation errors.…”
Section: Modeling Of Biomass Gasificationmentioning
confidence: 99%