31st Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 2005. IECON 2005. 2005
DOI: 10.1109/iecon.2005.1569098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System integration and demonstration of a 4.5 MVA STATCOM based on emitter turn-off (ETO) thyristor and cascade multilevel converter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6. With the modeling approach for the supercapacitor introduced in Section II, the common controller for the D-STATCON functionality can be designed as mentioned in [8,16]. It is very important that the general decoupled vector control of the D-STATCOM is valid, as long as the time frame of a particular application allows the supercapacitor parameter variations to be predicted and limited to what has been shown in the modeling section.…”
Section: Supercapacitor Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6. With the modeling approach for the supercapacitor introduced in Section II, the common controller for the D-STATCON functionality can be designed as mentioned in [8,16]. It is very important that the general decoupled vector control of the D-STATCOM is valid, as long as the time frame of a particular application allows the supercapacitor parameter variations to be predicted and limited to what has been shown in the modeling section.…”
Section: Supercapacitor Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it cannot react to the fast-varying flicker (1Hz~20Hz) very well with the inherent limit of relatively low bandwidth and hence its dynamic performance for flicker mitigation is limited [2]. The state-of-the-art solution is the STATCOM based on high frequency switching voltage-sourceconverter (VSC) [6]. While SVC performs as a controlled reactive admittance, STATCOM functions as a synchronous voltage source.…”
Section: Eaf System and Field Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cascaded-multilevel converter (CMC), which is constructed with identical H-bridge voltage source converters (VSCs), is deemed as the most feasible topology for a STATCOM application because of its compact structure, modularity, fast response and clean power quality [6] [12][13][14][15]. Therefore, a CMC-based STATCOM is adopted here.…”
Section: B Statcom Model and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An inherent benefit of this topology is that the TUCAP can easily be converted into a STATCOM for reactive power compensation when the UCAP is disconnected. Moreover, since H-bridge modular VSC has the capability of charging/discharging from the AC grid [19], the DC switch can be closed directly without any damping impedance to limit inrush current when the DC-link capacitors are charged equal to the open-circuit voltage of the UCAP string.…”
Section: Ucap Testing and Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the 4.5MVA PCS prototype system, three 1.5MVA modular VSCs based on ETO thyristor are designed, built and integrated as a 3-level CMC [16] [19]. The PCS prototype is currently configured as a STATCOM without energy storage for fast reactive power compensation.…”
Section: Ucap Testing and Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%