2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.01016.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System Plasticity and Integrated Care: Informed Consumers Guide Clinical Reorientation and System Reorganization

Abstract: System plasticity is as important to the process of integrated health care as it is to our understanding of the complexity of the lived experience of pain. Better-informed consumers partnered with responsive health professionals drive the proposed paradigm shift in service delivery. The changes better align the needs of consumers with the ability of health care providers to meet them, thus achieving the twin goals of patient empowerment and system efficiency.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings from targeted educational programmes for consumers [56] and health professionals [57] using similar evidence-based information appropriately titrated for each cohort, support the effectiveness of this interprofessional approach. Importantly, these approaches should recognise the psychosocial sequelae and comorbidities associated with persistent pain and better equip practitioners to recognise, assess and manage psychosocial contributions to persistent pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Findings from targeted educational programmes for consumers [56] and health professionals [57] using similar evidence-based information appropriately titrated for each cohort, support the effectiveness of this interprofessional approach. Importantly, these approaches should recognise the psychosocial sequelae and comorbidities associated with persistent pain and better equip practitioners to recognise, assess and manage psychosocial contributions to persistent pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…More research conducted with patients, not just about patients is needed. Some work has already been done in this area (Hogarth et al, 2010;Davies et al, 2011;Darking et al, 2014) but the challenge for the IS community is to consider how those local experiences can inform national initiatives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different systems of health care delivery complicate data comparisons and interpretation of trial outcomes is dogged by a lack of standardised pain assessment measures [27]. System inefficiencies exist due to inadequate use of validated screening criteria designed to match patient complexity with an appropriate level of resource allocation [28]. Furthermore, as there is no simple biomarker for pain and the lived experience cannot be inferred from imaging studies of the spine, including computed and functional magnetic resonance tomography, consistent adoption of evidence-based practice appears even more critical in achieving positive health and economic outcomes [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the adherence to guidelines by practitioners and the adoption of appropriate self management practices by patients are currently considered rational strategies to reduce the burden of spinal pain [28], [29], [30] and to deliver cost effective patient outcomes [18], [22]. Previously we have demonstrated reduced wait-times and costs at a public pain medicine unit and increased use of active pain management strategies [30] following a system redesign from a traditional model to one that delivers interprofessional patient group education sessions prior to individual appointments [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%