2010
DOI: 10.3208/sandf.50.343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System Reliability of Slopes by RFEM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geotechnical parameters are often assumed to follow a lognormal distribution as they cannot have negative values [43]. Assuming no correlations between the parameters in prior distribution, the prior distribution is expressed as…”
Section: Bayesian Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geotechnical parameters are often assumed to follow a lognormal distribution as they cannot have negative values [43]. Assuming no correlations between the parameters in prior distribution, the prior distribution is expressed as…”
Section: Bayesian Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geotechnical parameters are often considered to follow lognormal distributions because they cannot have negative values (Huang et al 2010b). The parameters in Table 2 have been selected to represent a soft clay with coefficients of variance (COV) within the range reported by Baecher and Christian (2003).…”
Section: Random Variables and Their Prior Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A polar co-ordinate defined search space is used instead of the more traditional Cartesian co-ordinate system, as this has been shown to be less sensitive to local discontinuities on the limit state surface (Val et al, 1996). As most slopes have multiple viable slip surfaces, the overall failure probability of the slope as a system should be evaluated, not just that of the critical failure surface; the probability of failure of the critical failure surface may be significantly less than that of the slope as a whole (Oka & Wu, 1990;Chowdhury & Xu, 1995;Huang et al, 2010;Zhang et al, 2011;Ji & Low, 2012). Therefore, this paper considers the correlation between different viable slip surfaces and uses that correlation to determine upper and lower bounds for the system's probability of failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over recent years with advances in computing power there has been renewed interest in simulation methods, with numerous authors proposing quasi Monte Carlo methods (Malkawi et al, 2001;Wang et al, 2011;Cheng et al, 2015) as a means of finding the critical probabilistic slip surface. Simulation techniques can be used to find both the system reliability (Griffiths & Fenton, 2004;Huang et al, 2010) and the reliability index for a given slip surface. However, this paper proposes an alternative approximate technique for rapidly finding the system reliability of a slope with multiple failure mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%