Proceedings. 19th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (Cat. No.99CB37003)
DOI: 10.1109/icdcs.1999.776542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System support for dynamic layout of distributed applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the model only seems to be available within the limits of simulation and not within a real distributed system. Our deployment policies may be similar to the dynamic layout of distributed applications in the FarGo system [4]. However, FarGo's policies aim at allowing an agent to control other agents, whereas our policies aim at allowing an agent to describe its own migration, because our framework always treats agents as autonomous entities that travel from computer to computer under their own control.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the model only seems to be available within the limits of simulation and not within a real distributed system. Our deployment policies may be similar to the dynamic layout of distributed applications in the FarGo system [4]. However, FarGo's policies aim at allowing an agent to control other agents, whereas our policies aim at allowing an agent to describe its own migration, because our framework always treats agents as autonomous entities that travel from computer to computer under their own control.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its agent groups can consist of agents working together on a common task, but they are not mobile. The FarGo system introduces the notion of a dynamic layout for distributed applications [7] in a decentralized manner. This is similar to our relocation policy in the sense that it allows each agent to have its own policy, but it is aimed at allowing one or more agents to control a single agent, whereas ours aims at allowing one agent to describe its own migration.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this problem, a few attempts to organize mobile agents have been proposed, e.g., MobileSpaces [11], CLAIM [5], and FarGo [7]. MobileSpaces and CLAIM enable each mobile agent to be organized within a tree structure and to migrate to other mobile agents, which may run on different computers, with its inner agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The framework enables two components on 7 As the dynamic creation mechanism is beyond the scope of this paper, we have omitted it here. Although the current implementation was not constructed for performance, we evaluated the group migration of three components (Fig.…”
Section: B Component Coordination Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%