2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2212.02714
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Analysis of Biomolecular Conformational Ensembles with PENSA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For two distributions P i and P j , and considering a feature x f from two different ensembles i and j where . The Kullback-Leibler divergence, D KL , corresponds to two distributions P i and P j is of the following form JSD values were computed using the Python ENSemble Analysis (PENSA) open-source library ( 65 ). Kernel density estimations of the JSD values were plotted to describe the JSD range and compare the systems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For two distributions P i and P j , and considering a feature x f from two different ensembles i and j where . The Kullback-Leibler divergence, D KL , corresponds to two distributions P i and P j is of the following form JSD values were computed using the Python ENSemble Analysis (PENSA) open-source library ( 65 ). Kernel density estimations of the JSD values were plotted to describe the JSD range and compare the systems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…79 Uncertainty is reported as the standard error of the mean, with each independent trajectory being treated as an independent measurement. The Jensen-Shannon distance 80 and the corresponding backbone torsion angles were computed using the PENSA 81 package for Python 3 with 10 bins. In the analysis of the β 7- β 10 gap, the autocorrelation was computed in Python 3, and fit using a sum of two exponentials with the form given in Equation 1 since the data was not well fit by a single exponential (Figure S4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the trajectories from these MD simulations to derive starting structure and, where necessary, restraints for the subsequent FEP calculations, following a systematic approach to quantify different structural ensembles (Supporting Information Text and Figure S5). 46 We computed distances between the Cα atoms of residues in the binding pocket and conducted k-means clustering in their joint principal-component space. We calculated average positions within each cluster for all the receptor's Cα atoms to use them as restraint centers, and the RMSF for each cluster to use it as the width of the restraints.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%