2022
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1035855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic analysis of the effects of genetic variants on chromatin accessibility to decipher functional variants in non-coding regions

Abstract: Genome-wide association study (GWAS) has identified thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with complex diseases and traits. However, deciphering the functions of these SNPs still faces challenges. Recent studies have shown that SNPs could alter chromatin accessibility and result in differences in tumor susceptibility between individuals. Therefore, systematically analyzing the effects of SNPs on chromatin accessibility could help decipher the functions of SNPs, especially those in non-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first assessed enrichment of VIP genes in regions of LRLD, relative to a null distribution in which regions of the same size were repeatedly randomly distributed around the genome, an approach widely used to assess the significance of associations of one genomic feature with another (e.g. (29, 30)). DNA virus VIP genes showed no enrichment of LRLD, consistent with the previous finding of no signals of selection at these VIPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first assessed enrichment of VIP genes in regions of LRLD, relative to a null distribution in which regions of the same size were repeatedly randomly distributed around the genome, an approach widely used to assess the significance of associations of one genomic feature with another (e.g. (29, 30)). DNA virus VIP genes showed no enrichment of LRLD, consistent with the previous finding of no signals of selection at these VIPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%