2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02466-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic approach for assessment of imaging features in chronic pancreatitis: a feasibility and validation study from the Scandinavian Baltic Pancreatic Club (SBPC) database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We performed measurements using the same standardized positions for the pancreatic body, and added a standardized measurement of the pancreatic head. These standards are simple and have demonstrated good inter-observer reproducibility [17]. The 25-percentile cut-off for the measures of the body of pancreas in males in our cohort was largely corresponding to the cut-offs for moderate atrophy in the two studies mentioned above, but indicate a somewhat lower cut-off for females.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We performed measurements using the same standardized positions for the pancreatic body, and added a standardized measurement of the pancreatic head. These standards are simple and have demonstrated good inter-observer reproducibility [17]. The 25-percentile cut-off for the measures of the body of pancreas in males in our cohort was largely corresponding to the cut-offs for moderate atrophy in the two studies mentioned above, but indicate a somewhat lower cut-off for females.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…By distributing instructions to the centres before the registrations, we attempted to reduce such differences. In a recent study we found good inter-observer reproducibility for the applied standards [17].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both followed standards for reading that were defined in advance. 18 They were blinded to other examiner's interpretation of the imaging data and results from other diagnostic tests. Blinding for the general reason for referral (suspected CP) was not feasible.…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%