2022
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2022.3177169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Codes Correcting Multiple-Deletion and Multiple-Substitution Errors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study of codes that correct single-deletion and single-substitution errors was first introduced in the context of DNA-based data storage in [18] and further developed in [19]. More recently, codes that correct multiple-deletion and multiple-substitution errors were proposed in [20]. These results apply to our error model as well, but in this paper we demonstrate that it is possible to use specific absorption properties to achieve higher rates in our codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The study of codes that correct single-deletion and single-substitution errors was first introduced in the context of DNA-based data storage in [18] and further developed in [19]. More recently, codes that correct multiple-deletion and multiple-substitution errors were proposed in [20]. These results apply to our error model as well, but in this paper we demonstrate that it is possible to use specific absorption properties to achieve higher rates in our codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…So we can apply multiple-deletion correcting codes for our setting. There are already a myriad of works on binary multiple-deletion correcting codes (see, for example, [20], [22], [23], [29]- [31]). For t = 2, the best known result was given in [23], where an explicit binary 2-deletion correcting code of length n with redundancy at most 4 log 2 (n) + O(log 2 log 2 (n)) was constructed.…”
Section: Codes Over Binary Alphabetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations