2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2022.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Collaborative Reanalysis of Genomic Data Improves Diagnostic Yield in Neurologic Rare Diseases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All patients underwent initial WES analysis and were analysed using ClinPrior. At first, the diagnostic rate counting only pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants was 53/135 (39%), which increased to 60/135 (44.4%) after subsequent reanalysis at 12 and 24 months, thus confirming the previously reported importance of case reanalysis [33,34]. The reanalysis included novel interactomes, novel disease associations and an improved variant calling procedure.…”
Section: Diagnostic Yield Of Wes and Wgs In The Hsp/ca Real-world Dis...supporting
confidence: 76%
“…All patients underwent initial WES analysis and were analysed using ClinPrior. At first, the diagnostic rate counting only pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants was 53/135 (39%), which increased to 60/135 (44.4%) after subsequent reanalysis at 12 and 24 months, thus confirming the previously reported importance of case reanalysis [33,34]. The reanalysis included novel interactomes, novel disease associations and an improved variant calling procedure.…”
Section: Diagnostic Yield Of Wes and Wgs In The Hsp/ca Real-world Dis...supporting
confidence: 76%
“…Most articles describe an increase in the expected diagnostic yield as the main reason to consider implementation of systematic reanalysis. Almost all the studies that conducted reanalysis reported an increase in diagnostic yield [ 4 , 11 , 17 , 20 , 21 , 24 – 28 , 30 51 ], but the increase varied widely between the studies. One possible explanation for this variation is differences in the analytical or technical approaches used, which make it difficult to compare studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a largescale reanalysis effort of exomes and genomes from undiagnosed disease families has been conducted within the Solve-RD consortium; this study illustrates that updated knowledge and improved variant identification and interpretation substantially increase diagnostic yield (S. Laurie, W. Steyaert, E. de Boer et al, Nat Med in revision). Other re-analysis efforts have resulted in similar increases in diagnostic yield (Bullich et al, 2022;Liu et al, 2019;. Despite this, most tested RD patients remain without a genetic diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%