2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2015.06.046
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic comparison of DFT and CCSD dipole moments, polarizabilities and hyperpolarizabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One should also mention that generalized gradient approximation (GGA) functional such as PBE have intrinsic failures regarding the calculation of hyperpolarizabilities. 61 However, the relative values as compared to TZP calculations are very similar, with the exception of the PBE/TZ2P calculation on the PBE structure, which is somewhat larger. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 The HOMO-LUMO (HL) gaps of the clusters and their static first hyperpolarizabilities β 0 are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One should also mention that generalized gradient approximation (GGA) functional such as PBE have intrinsic failures regarding the calculation of hyperpolarizabilities. 61 However, the relative values as compared to TZP calculations are very similar, with the exception of the PBE/TZ2P calculation on the PBE structure, which is somewhat larger. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 The HOMO-LUMO (HL) gaps of the clusters and their static first hyperpolarizabilities β 0 are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…One should also mention that generalized gradient approximation (GGA) functional such as PBE has intrinsic failures regarding the calculation of hyperpolarizabilities. 61 However, the relative values as compared to TZP calculations are very similar, with the exception of the PBE/TZ2P calculation on the PBE structure, which is somewhat larger.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The polarizability tensor components are calculated from the perturbed density matrix elements P μν (λ) (ω) given by eq and dipole moment integral as Here λ and κ refer to components of the electric field and dipole moment, respectively. From the polarizability tensor in its principle axes system, the average polarizabilities α̅(ω) and polarizability anisotropies, |Δα­(ω)| 2 , are calculated by Four-center ERI reference calculations were performed with NWChem using the default keywords.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the successes of the range-separated hybrid functionals is for molecular polarizability calculations. Although coupled-cluster (CC) , calculations are in principle more reliable for polarizabilities, their unfavorable computational scaling with system size makes them only partially suitable for systematic polarizability studies . Thus, range-separated hybrid calculations of polarizabilities are the current state-of-the-art for systematic polarizability and hyperpolarizability studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides some smaller studies, by far the most comprehensive benchmark data sets available to date for dipole moments and static polarizabilities are those by Hait and Head-Gordon. , They generated CCSD­(T) reference values extrapolated to the complete basis-set limit (CBS) for 152 dipole moments (HHdip-152) and polarizabilities (HHpol-132) for 132 small molecules and atoms, and they assessed the performance of a considerable number of popular and modern XC functionals. While improvements were seen for both properties when stepping up the Jacob’s Ladder of XC functionals, differences in performance between individual functionals from the same rung were substantial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%