Systematic composition of independent language features

Butting, Arvid; Eikermann, Robert; Kautz, Oliver; Rumpe, Bernhard; Wortmann, Andreas

doi:10.1016/j.jss.2019.02.026

Cited by 19 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(1) to decompose a software system into a group of aspects known as concerns (Butting, Eikermann, Kautz, Rumpe, & Wortmann, 2019;Kumar, Kumar, & Iyyappan, 2016) and (2) to compose crosscutting concerns between aspects and core modules using a weaving process of a joint point (Muck & Frohlich, 2014).…”

Section: Aspect-oriented Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Practical Model From Multidimensional Layering: Personal Finance Information Framework Using Mobile Software Interface Operations

Rukhiran

Netinant

2020

Journal of Information and Communication Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

End user involvement is crucial in improving software development processes. Hence, nowadays user interface (UI) and user experience (UX) are particularly concerned with end user interactions in many software designs as most methodologies have inconsistencies between design and implementation. Besides, it is relatively difficult to make changes in complex software and personal finance application is one of the more complex software to design, develop, and adapt. This paper proposes the development of a mobile personal finance application using informative multidimensional layering. We have separated functional data cutting across the relationships of three categories and datasets showing operational semantics of dimensions, and combined layers of three-dimensional information including aspect elements through components. This study is concerned with the corresponsive composition of end user features using visual interfaces. It is illustrated in a Three-layer User Interface Composition Model to transfer and compose layers, functional data, aspect elements, and components to Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs). Therefore, an integrated view of the software system would make the design and implementation consistent to support our framework in a more straightforward manner.

show abstract

Section: Aspect-oriented Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Practical Model From Multidimensional Layering: Personal Finance Information Framework Using Mobile Software Interface Operations

Rukhiran

Netinant

2020

Journal of Information and Communication Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Section 11.3 then introduces our notion of language components, before Section 11.4 explains their composition. Section 11.5 explains how we leverage composable language components to structure language reuse through explicit variability models, which we employed in CrESt to develop variants [Butting et al 2019] of the MontiArc ADL [Haber et al 2012] tailored to the use cases of "Autonomous Transport Robots" and "Adaptable and Flexible Factory" (cf. Chapter 1).…”

Section: Example 11-1: a Family Of Architecture Description Languagesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Multi-inheritance in grammars can be used to compose two independently developed grammars and through this, realize language embedding. Therefore, the composition operator for embedding a MontiCore grammar into another MontiCore grammar produces a new grammar that inherits from both source grammars [Butting et al 2019]. Furthermore, a grammar production integrating extension point and extension are generated, depending on the kind of syntax extension point (e.g., an interface production) and the kind of extension (e.g., a parser production).…”

Section: Language Component Compositionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Enriching general purpose 11.5 Language Product Lines modeling language with application domain-specific language concepts helps to bridge this gap. Modular language engineering in terms of developing language components as presented in Section 11.3 and composing these as presented in Section 11.4 can be used to realize product lines of languages [Butting et al 2019]. Such language product lines enable systematic reuse of language components for a family of similar languages and, therefore, enable individual tailoring of the modeling languages to the application fields of CESs and CSGs.…”

Section: Language Product Linesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Language Engineering for Heterogeneous Collaborative Embedded Systems

Butting

Wortmann

2020

Model-Based Engineering of Collaborative Embedded Systems

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

At the core of model-driven development (MDD) of collaborative embedded systems (CESs) are models that realize the different participating stakeholders’ views of the systems. For CESs, these views contain various models to represent requirements, logical functions, collaboration functions, and technical realizations. To enable automated processing, these models must conform to modeling languages. Domain-specific languages (DSLs) that leverage concepts and terminology established by the stakeholders are key to their success. The variety of domains in which CESs are applied has led to a magnitude of different DSLs. These are manually engineered, composed, and customized for different applications, a process which is costly and error-prone. We present an approach for engineering independent language components and composing these using systematic composition operators. To support structured reuse of language components, we further present a methodology for building up product lines of such language components. This fosters engineering of collaborative embedded systems with modeling techniques tailored to each application.

show abstract

“…Neverlang [27], [28] also proposes a DSL that represents the syntax by a set of productions coded in BNF. Monti-Core [29], [30] proposes Grammar Definition Language for defining both concrete and abstract syntax. The benefit of using the same language for both elements is to reduce the inconsistency and redundancy between the two elements.…”

Section: A Grammar-driven Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Survey on Domain Specific Languages Implementation Aspects

Negm¹,

Makady²,

Salah³

2019

IJACSA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Domain Specific Languages (DSLs) bridge the gap between the business model and the technical model. DSLs allow the technical developer to write programs with the business domain notations. This leads to higher productivity and better quality than General Purpose Languages (GPLs). One of the main challenges of utilizing DSLs in the current software process is how to reduce the implementation cost and the knowledge required for building and maintaining DSLs. Language workbenches are environments that provide high level tools for implementing different language aspects. The purpose of this paper is to provide a survey on the different aspects of implementing DSLs. The survey includes structure, editor, semantics, and composability language aspects. Furthermore, it overviews the approaches used for each aspect and classify the current workbenches according to these approaches.

show abstract

Systematic composition of independent language features

Cited by 19 publications

References 19 publications

A Practical Model From Multidimensional Layering: Personal Finance Information Framework Using Mobile Software Interface Operations

A Practical Model From Multidimensional Layering: Personal Finance Information Framework Using Mobile Software Interface Operations

Language Engineering for Heterogeneous Collaborative Embedded Systems

Survey on Domain Specific Languages Implementation Aspects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About