2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic cross-validation of photovoltaic energy yield models for dynamic environmental conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major differences in energy yield predictions occur only when the time step is raised to 600 s, likely due to the loss of information on the dynamics of the system. This result is in agreement with findings in [51] and [52], which highlight the inability of temporal resolutions above 600 s to capture the (BI)PV dynamics.…”
Section: Shading Effectssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The major differences in energy yield predictions occur only when the time step is raised to 600 s, likely due to the loss of information on the dynamics of the system. This result is in agreement with findings in [51] and [52], which highlight the inability of temporal resolutions above 600 s to capture the (BI)PV dynamics.…”
Section: Shading Effectssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…All the previous methods are optimized for the prediction of "power" and not "energy". As exhibited in (Anagnostos et al, 2017, Goverde et al, 2015, the thermal state of the PV system cannot ignored for time steps below 5min, as it augments inaccuracies in the final estimation. Another important piece of information that is rarely used is the type of weather itself.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One source of this offset has been recognized in (Schmidt, 2017) , where the bias of the forecasted GHI increases with the horizon in a similar trend. Another contribution to the bias has been described also in (Anagnostos et al, 2017), which is the inability of the parametric yield models to capture the thermal behavior of a PV system for high time resolutions. This inability usually appears as an offset on the power production estimation, due to the calculated operating temperature and can only be mitigated by a dynamic model, like the proposed one.…”
Section: B Comparison To Power Forecastmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations