2017
DOI: 10.3846/20294913.2016.1212121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Decision Making: A Extended Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model

Abstract: Considering some complex multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problems, in which decision environment is dynamic, there are various interdependences among criteria, and plans (systematized alternatives) consisting of multiple time sequential interdependent actions, cannot be well handled by means of the existing MCDM methods, therefore, we develop a systematic decision making (SDM) as an improvement and supplement of the classic MCDM in this paper. The SDM is for prescribing methods of evaluating and selectin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While criteria weights are assumed to be constant over time, confidence levels associated with periods need to be elicited from decision makers and can change in the future. In [53], a generic MP multi-criteria approach is developed, which acknowledges multiple periods and uncertainties. However, the specific methods for MP aggregation and uncertainty consideration are not described.…”
Section: Literature Review: Mp Madm Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While criteria weights are assumed to be constant over time, confidence levels associated with periods need to be elicited from decision makers and can change in the future. In [53], a generic MP multi-criteria approach is developed, which acknowledges multiple periods and uncertainties. However, the specific methods for MP aggregation and uncertainty consideration are not described.…”
Section: Literature Review: Mp Madm Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, decision-making can be analysed by evaluating the problem's complexity and the decision-maker's preferences towards criteria. These criteria can be impacted by changes in external conditions and the decision-maker's emotions (Yu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%