2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.06.176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Design of Split Range Controllers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each input, the SR-block can be represented as the linear function u i = α i v + u 0 i ∀i ∈ {1, 2, 3}. The slopes (α i ) in Table A4 are found with the procedure described in Reference [7] using the tuning parameters in Table A3. Here we consider v = 0 and all inputs closed at the nominal operating point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For each input, the SR-block can be represented as the linear function u i = α i v + u 0 i ∀i ∈ {1, 2, 3}. The slopes (α i ) in Table A4 are found with the procedure described in Reference [7] using the tuning parameters in Table A3. Here we consider v = 0 and all inputs closed at the nominal operating point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows the block diagram of a split range controller (SRC) with two inputs (u 1 and u 2 ) for one output (y). Here, there is a common controller (C) that produces an internal signal in deviation variables (v) that is the input to the split range (SR) block, which calculates the values for u i (in physical variables) [7].…”
Section: Classical Advanced Control Structures For More Than One Inpumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, we bring m tot sp back to its initial value at t = 70 s. All the tunings were found using the SIMC tuning rules. 43 The split range control structure was designed using the systematic procedure proposed by Reyes-Luá et al 35 When we do not follow the input saturation pairing rule and do not implement any advanced control structure (Case B), y 2 = ṁt ot is highest, but it comes at the expense of not keeping y 1 = x MeOH at its set point and, thus, violating its maximum constraint (see Table 1).…”
Section: Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%