2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic downstream process development for purification of baccatin III with key performance indicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite differences in polarity of the triterpenoids betulin and betulinic acid, assessed from 1‐octanol/water partition coefficients (betulin: 9.01, betulinic acid: 8.94) estimated with ACD/Chemsketch freeware, none of the screened extraction solvents was suited to selectively extract the acid. Equally, an additional purification step of adsorption/desorption with both ethyl acetate and acetone extracts using different adsorber materials as described in Winkelnkemper () turned out to be nonselective and gave low yields (data not shown). As the solubility of betulinic acid and other hydrophobic triterpenoids is pH‐dependent and decreases at low pH (Jäger, Winkler, Pfuller, & Scheffler, ), we evaluated polar acetone‐miscible antisolvents enabling precipitation for product recovery.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite differences in polarity of the triterpenoids betulin and betulinic acid, assessed from 1‐octanol/water partition coefficients (betulin: 9.01, betulinic acid: 8.94) estimated with ACD/Chemsketch freeware, none of the screened extraction solvents was suited to selectively extract the acid. Equally, an additional purification step of adsorption/desorption with both ethyl acetate and acetone extracts using different adsorber materials as described in Winkelnkemper () turned out to be nonselective and gave low yields (data not shown). As the solubility of betulinic acid and other hydrophobic triterpenoids is pH‐dependent and decreases at low pH (Jäger, Winkler, Pfuller, & Scheffler, ), we evaluated polar acetone‐miscible antisolvents enabling precipitation for product recovery.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…q resin;jÀ1 (19) Therein, V product,j-1 describes the size of the product pool collected in step j-1. In case of a flow-through, in which no fractionation takes place, the product mass balance simplifies to: c prod;in;j ¼ Y jÀ1 c prod;in;jÀ1 (20) The resulting rate-dependent specific costs as well as the additionally required flow velocities and product pool sizes are listed in Tab.…”
Section: Purification Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three key performance indicators are successfully applied by Winkelnkemper et al on literature examples [17,18] as well as on the example of purifying Baccatin III from a Taxus culture [19]. The resulting three-step purification sequence for Baccatin III consists of adsorption on Amberlite XAD-7, washing with water, and desorption with toluene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such methods are often used to optimize conditions for mAb polishing steps involving product variant removal, and several groups have also used these techniques to design non‐mAb purification processes (Bhambure, Gupta, & Rathore, ; Kateja, Kumar, Godara, Kumar, & Rathore, ). To effectively utilize the large amount of data collected in HTS experiments and to span a wider breadth of design space, in silico techniques have been used to further inform a knowledge‐based synthesis of new downstream processes (Asenjo & Andews, ; Asenjo, Herrera, & Byrne, ; Eriksson, Sandahl, Forslund, & Österlund, ; Petrides, ; Swanson, Xu, Nettleson, & Glatz, ; Watanabe, Tsoka, & Asenjo, ; Winkelnkemper & Schembecker, ; Winkelnkemper & Schembecker, ). Reported strategies, however, often rely on time‐consuming proteomic analysis of host cell proteins (HCPs), extensive characterization of the biophysical or biochemical attributes of the proteins, or tracking of individual impurities (Hanke & Ottens, ; Hanke et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%