2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11431-010-4129-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic error analysis and compensation for high accuracy star centroid estimation of star tracker

Abstract: Subpixel centroid estimation is the most important star image location method of star tracker. This paper presents a theoretical analysis of the systematic error of subpixel centroid estimation algorithm utilizing frequency domain analysis under the consideration of sampling frequency limitation and sampling window limitation. Explicit expression of systematic error of centroid estimation is obtained, and the dependence of systematic error on Gaussian width of star image, actual star centroid location and the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because the I k / I 0 is decreasing and the energy center of each pixel becomes nearer to the geometric center with the lengthening of the star-spot trail. The amplitude of the systematic error in the static condition is exp[−2(πσ) 2 ]/π, which mainly depends on the Gaussian radius [9]. For the 0.7 pixel Gaussian radius, it is just about 2 × 10 −5 pixels which is in agreement with the above simulation.…”
Section: Star Location Accuracysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This is because the I k / I 0 is decreasing and the energy center of each pixel becomes nearer to the geometric center with the lengthening of the star-spot trail. The amplitude of the systematic error in the static condition is exp[−2(πσ) 2 ]/π, which mainly depends on the Gaussian radius [9]. For the 0.7 pixel Gaussian radius, it is just about 2 × 10 −5 pixels which is in agreement with the above simulation.…”
Section: Star Location Accuracysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The key to compensating systematic error in the CoM method lies in predicting the corresponding systematic error σx g of the actual star centroid positionx g accurately and rapidly. Researchers have proposed several compensation methods in recent years, such as the BP method [16], analytical compensation (AC) method [17], bivariate polynomial method [18], and LSSVR compensation method [19], and they can reduce the systematic error to some extent, but there are some shortcomings in the compensation model of these methods. For example, the poor performance indices and low learning rate of the BP algorithm, along with how easily it becomes trapped in a local optimum, limit the compensation accuracy of this method; the simplified approximation and iteration estimation in the analytical compensation method lead to a reduction in the prediction accuracy and high on-line computational complexity, which is not suitable for the on-orbit embedded system; the bivariate polynomial compensation template is valid only for some specific Gaussian width cases, and its application range is thus limited; and the problem of scientifically setting the penalty factor and kernel parameter in LSSVR still remains unsettled, meaning that model training is more difficult because of a time-consuming parameter selection process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subpixel peak localization methods have been widely studied not only to locate point sources, but also implement high accuracy stars trackers systems [8]. In this section, we present three different spot localization methods to be used sensing module: Centroid, centroid windowed and centroid squared.…”
Section: Spot Localization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%