2004
DOI: 10.1364/ao.43.006100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic errors in nulling interferometers

Abstract: Nulling interferometers combine on-axis suppression with high angular resolution, making them ideal instruments for the direct detection of faint planets close to their parent star. Analysis is developed to show that it is systematic errors, resulting from fluctuations in the null depth, that drive the instrument performance. A second-order combination of amplitude and phase errors is the dominant contributor. In the calculated example, the detection of an Earthlike planet around a Sunlike star at 15 pc requir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
103
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values will be used thorough this study (see appendix A for further details). Although our computation has been done at 7 μm where instability noise is much higher than at 10 μm, these constraints are not far from the values derived by Lay (2004) for two reasons. First, the telescopes considered here are smaller so that shot noise is relatively more dominant than in the previous analyses (shot noise is proportional to the square root of the stellar flux while the planetary signal and instability noise are directly proportional to the stellar flux).…”
Section: Instability Noisementioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These values will be used thorough this study (see appendix A for further details). Although our computation has been done at 7 μm where instability noise is much higher than at 10 μm, these constraints are not far from the values derived by Lay (2004) for two reasons. First, the telescopes considered here are smaller so that shot noise is relatively more dominant than in the previous analyses (shot noise is proportional to the square root of the stellar flux while the planetary signal and instability noise are directly proportional to the stellar flux).…”
Section: Instability Noisementioning
confidence: 93%
“…At the output of the interferometer, the total detected photon rate (excluding stray light) can be written as (Lay 2004):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the PDT a realistic planet signal can be created by controlling the optical path relationships between four planet source beams, simulating the phase changes caused by rotation of the telescope array around the line of sight to the star. Moreover, as a four-beam combiner, the testbed produces instability noise (Lay 2004); the testbed has systems and control loops analogous to those needed for flight in order to control the instability noise and maintain deep nulls.…”
Section: Principle and Objectives Of The Testbedmentioning
confidence: 99%