2023
DOI: 10.3390/w15061213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Evaluation and Influencing Factors Analysis of Water Environmental Carrying Capacity in Taihu Basin, China

Abstract: Systematic evaluation of water environment carrying capacity (WECC) is a prerequisite for achieving sustainable development, which reflects the water environment comprehensive condition of lake basin under the current economic development scenario. Therefore, taking the Taihu Basin as a case study, a scientific comprehensive evaluation index system of WECC was established based on the Pressure-State-Response (PSR) assessment framework, which included water resources (WR), pollution emission (PE), water quality… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The establishment of the indicator system of the land and water resource system is the basis and prerequisite for analyzing the evolution trend, and also the main basis for determining the influencing factors [33]. In this paper, we observe the basic principles of data accessibility, objectivity, and overall operability of the indicator system [34].…”
Section: Constructing Indicator Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The establishment of the indicator system of the land and water resource system is the basis and prerequisite for analyzing the evolution trend, and also the main basis for determining the influencing factors [33]. In this paper, we observe the basic principles of data accessibility, objectivity, and overall operability of the indicator system [34].…”
Section: Constructing Indicator Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of model methods have gradually emerged, such as principal component analysis [5,6] , matter-element model [7,8] , projection pursuit [9,10] , fuzzy evaluation [11][12][13] , multi-objective decision [14][15][16] , water footprint theory [17][18][19] , system dynamics method (SD) [20][21] . With the improvement of the theoretical system, the comprehensive method coupled model evaluation system [22,23] has been further improved, such as DPSIR model [24] , PSR model [25,26] , quality-domain-flow model [27][28] and multi-dimensional cloud model [29][30][31][32] . With the wide application of machine learning technology, neural network algorithm [33][34][35] , genetic algorithm [36,37] and particle swarm optimization algorithm [38,39] have been applied to the quantitative calculation of water resources carrying capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking total phosphorus load as an example, the annual riverine total phosphorus load accounts for 55% to 70% of the total load, serving as the primary pathway for exogenous input (Li et al 2022). One of the reasons for this is that the current studies on the control and reduction of major water pollutants are mainly based on the regional water environment capacity, especially regarding total nitrogen and total phosphorus (Yan et al 2019a, Hu et al 2023. However, in reality, legacy internal nitrogen and phosphorus supplies can lead to a lag between reduction in external loading and decreases in bloom magnitude and areal extent (Xu et al 2021a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%