Systematic evaluation of complications related to endoscopy in a training setting: A prospective 30-day outcomes study

Bini, Edmund J.; Firoozi, Babak; Choung, Rosa J.; Ali, Eyad M.; Osman, Mohamed; Weinshel, Elizabeth

doi:10.1016/s0016-5107(03)70107-2

Cited by 14 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is prolonged compared with some reports in the literature from expert technical colonoscopists,28 but in line with studies of routine clinical practice which report times from 7-11 minutes 7, 11, 18, 21, 29, 30. The immediate complication rate of 0.4% that we detected, however, is consistent with other estimates in the literature,4, 5, 7 with the caveat that retrospective series often underestimate the total number of procedural complications 6. Our overall cecal intubation rate, too, was similar to those rates previously reported in the literature (most of which range between 91 and 99%, depending on the study setting and colonoscopy indication),5, 7, 12, 13, 15-19, 30 and met the goal set forth by the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer 31…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Effect of GI endoscopy nurse experience on screening colonoscopy outcomes

Dellon

Lippmann

Galanko

et al. 2009

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Effect of GI endoscopy nurse experience on screening colonoscopy outcomes

Dellon

Lippmann

Galanko

et al. 2009

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There is some evidence that patients experiencing complications after endoscopy are less satisfied and less likely to return for a repeat endoscopy. 54 As endoscopy complications are rare, this would require a sample much larger than in the present study. Another possible approach would be to correlate the patient satisfaction data with the change in SF-36 scores at 1 day after endoscopy and see whether patients reporting higher satisfaction levels have better general health.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

What are the clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of endoscopy undertaken by nurses when compared with doctors? A Multi-Institution Nurse Endoscopy Trial (MINuET)

Williams¹,

Russell²,

Durai³

et al. 2006

Health Technol Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Non-UK purchasers will have to pay a small fee for post and packing. For European countries the cost is £2 per monograph and for the rest of the world £3 per monograph.You can order HTA monographs from our Despatch Agents:-fax (with credit card or official purchase order) -post (with credit card or official purchase order or cheque) -phone during office hours (credit card only).Additionally the HTA website allows you either to pay securely by credit card or to print out your order and then post or fax it. Contact Payment methods Paying by chequeIf you pay by cheque, the cheque must be in pounds sterling, made payable to Direct Mail Works Ltd and drawn on a bank with a UK address. Paying by credit cardThe following cards are accepted by phone, fax, post or via the website ordering pages: Delta, Eurocard, Mastercard, Solo, Switch and Visa. We advise against sending credit card details in a plain email. Paying by official purchase orderYou can post or fax these, but they must be from public bodies (i.e. NHS or universities) within the UK.We cannot at present accept purchase orders from commercial companies or from outside the UK. How do I get a copy of HTA on CD?Please use the form on the HTA website (www.hta.ac.uk/htacd.htm). Or contact Direct Mail Works (see contact details above) by email, post, fax or phone. HTA on CD is currently free of charge worldwide.The website also provides information about the HTA Programme and lists the membership of the various committees. HTA NHS R&D HTA ProgrammeT he research findings from the NHS R&D Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme directly influence key decision-making bodies such as the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and the National Screening Committee (NSC) who rely on HTA outputs to help raise standards of care. HTA findings also help to improve the quality of the service in the NHS indirectly in that they form a key component of the 'National Knowledge Service' that is being developed to improve the evidence of clinical practice throughout the NHS.The HTA Programme was set up in 1993. Its role is to ensure that high-quality research information on the costs, effectiveness and broader impact of health technologies is produced in the most efficient way for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS. 'Health technologies' are broadly defined to include all interventions used to promote health, prevent and treat disease, and improve rehabilitation and long-term care, rather than settings of care.The HTA Programme commissions research only on topics where it has identified key gaps in the evidence needed by the NHS. Suggestions for topics are actively sought from people working in the NHS, the public, service-users groups and professional bodies such as Royal Colleges and NHS Trusts.Research suggestions are carefully considered by panels of independent experts (including service users) whose advice results in a ranked list of recommended research priorities. The HTA Programme then commissions the research team best suited to und...

show abstract

“…10,11 Bini et al showed that there is a significant association between negative outcomes and decreased satisfaction in patients undergoing colonoscopy. This is usually because of the perceived lack of clinical relevance of these symptoms given that they are usually mild and self-limiting.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%