“…Fifteen Stutzerimonas hosts were screened for plasmid transformability and inverter operability, in which ten were successfully transformed via electroporation with a pBBR1-KanR backbone vector (BB23). Six of these ten were chosen for further study, which are as follows: Stutzerimonas chloritidismutans NCTC10475 (S. chloritidismutans) 25 , Stutzerimonas perfectomarina CCUG 44592 (S. perfectomarina) 18 , Stutzerimonas degradans FDAARGOS 876 (S. degradans) 18 , Stutzerimonas stutzeri 24a13 (S. stutzeri 24a13) 26 , Stutzerimonas stutzeri 24a75 (S. stutzeri 24a75) 26 and Stutzerimonas stutzeri DSM 4166 (S. stutzeri DSM 4166) 27,28 Comparative pangenomics of the selected Stutzerimonas hosts revealed almost equal sizes between the core and accessory genomes, propitiously setting the stage for investigating whether the measurable chassis-effect can be attributed to differential expression from the core or accessory genomes and which specific functions covary with host-specific device performance. Pangenome analysis of Stutzerimonas host genomes was performed using Anvi'o 29 , leading to a total of 25,344 gene calls functionally annotated using the 2020 clusters of orthologous genes (COGs) database (Fig.…”