2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic identification of phosphorylation-mediated protein interaction switches

Abstract: Proteomics techniques can identify thousands of phosphorylation sites in a single experiment, the majority of which are new and lack precise information about function or molecular mechanism. Here we present a fast method to predict potential phosphorylation switches by mapping phosphorylation sites to protein-protein interactions of known structure and analysing the properties of the protein interface. We predict 1024 sites that could potentially enable or disable particular interactions. We tested a selectio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our minimalistic approach to predicting regulatory phosphorylation based on available structural information, though simpler than methods employed previously [52][53][54] , was successful at predicting disruptive phosphorylation (Fig. 5).…”
Section: D Phosphoproteome Analysis Provides Insights Into Function mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Our minimalistic approach to predicting regulatory phosphorylation based on available structural information, though simpler than methods employed previously [52][53][54] , was successful at predicting disruptive phosphorylation (Fig. 5).…”
Section: D Phosphoproteome Analysis Provides Insights Into Function mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Examining PTMs and sequence annotations associated with proteins (as presented in Basic Protocol 2 and 3) can be useful for identifying specific interacting domains or motifs that contain specific PTMs, and therefore have the potential to affect the binding of proteins (Seet et al, 2006;Van Roey et al, 2012 and may be candidates for further statistical network analyses or experimental validation. Furthermore, visualizing the co-location of PTM sites and sequence annotations on a sequence level can also provide clues as to whether the PTM affects the protein allosterically or contribute to protein-protein binding interfaces (Nussinov et al, 2012;Betts et al, 2017;Pang & Wilkins, 2019).…”
Section: Guidelines For Understanding Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phosphorylation is an important molecular mechanism for regulation of PIPs, acting on both channel gating and protein subcellular trafficking (Maurel et al, 2015, for review). Phosphorylation can also interfere with protein-protein interactions (Betts et al, 2017). Four phosphorylation sites have been described in PIP2;1, at Ser121 (loop B), Ser277, Ser280, and Ser283 (C-terminal end) (Di Pietro et al, 2013;Grondin et al, 2015;Prak et al, 2008).…”
Section: Coexpression Of Pip2;1 With Two Different Quantities Of Caspmentioning
confidence: 99%