Chromosomes, allozymes, and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) were analyzed to examine the taxonomic and systematic relationships of coastal Peromyscus from northern Washington to southern Alaska. All three datasets indicate that Peromyscus from this region constitute two distinct groups. One group comprises P. oreas, P. sitkensis, and several currently recognized subspecies of P. maniculatus including P. m. algidus, P. m. hylaeus, P. m. keeni, P. m. macrorhinus, and P. m. prevostensis. The second group comprises only populations of P. m. austerus. The. former group is differentiated from the latter by number of autosomal arms, allele-frequency differences, and mtDNA haplotypes. This dichotomy in karyotype, and the level of allozymic and mtDNA divergence between the groups suggest that the groups constitute distinct species. We recommend that P. oreas, P. sitkensis, P. maniculatus algidus, P. m. hylaeus, P. m. keeni, P. m. macrorhinus, and P. m. prevostensis be recognized under the specific epithet of Peromyscus keeni.The taxonomy of deer mice (Peramyscus) inhabiting the Pacific Northwest from Washington to southern Alaska has been complicated by extensive insular endemism resulting in a plethora of recognized taxa. Hall (1981) recognized two species in this region,P. maniculatusandP. sitkensis. From the Columbia River north to southern Alaska and west of the Cascade and Coastal mountain ranges, P. maniculatus was considered to comprise 27 subspecies distributed over the entire mainland and on most of the associated islands (Hall, 1981). Despite considerable evidence supporting the specific status of P. areas (Dice, 1949; J ohnson and Ostenson, 1959; Liu, 1954; Sheppe, J. Mamm., 74(4):819-831,1993 819 1961), Hall (1981) retained the taxon as a subspecies of P. maniculatus. Gunn andGunn (1988) reexamined the systematic status of areas and concluded that it is distinct from sympatric populations of P. m. austerus.These taxa can be discretely separated based on the number of autosomal arms (fundamental number, FN) in the karyotype. Populations of P. areas are characterized by a high FN (85-92), whereas P. m. austerus has a low FN (74-78). The absence of intermediate FNs in areas of sympatry was interpreted to indicate reproductive isolation.The specific status of P. areas has been further supported by morphologic (Allard and