2000
DOI: 10.1021/ja004655b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Investigations of the Nature of the Coupling between a Ln(III) Ion (Ln = Ce(III) to Dy(III)) and Its Aminoxyl Radical Ligands. Structural and Magnetic Characteristics of a Series of {Ln(organic radical)2} Compounds and the Related {Ln(Nitrone)2} Derivatives  [J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3413−3421].

Abstract: We noted in the experimental section that one of the reported crystal structures, {Pr(Nitrone) 2 (NO 3 ) 3 }, may be better described in the noncentrosymmetric space group P1 than in the centrosymmetric space group P1 h; this choice was based on better classical quality criterions in the former. Nevertheless, following discussions with careful readers we acknowledge and from consideration based on atomic displacement parameters we believe that this crystal structure is more likely to be centrosymmetric. Howeve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
95
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
10
95
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[10][11][12][13] In addition, a large number of studies have examined the coupling between f-ions and adjacent paramagnetic transition metals or organic radicals. 1,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] Two factors make it challenging to quantify f-electron coupling. First, the magnetic moments of f-ions, except for f 7 -systems, are temperature dependent and highly anisotropic due to a combination of strong spin-orbit coupling and weak crystal fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[10][11][12][13] In addition, a large number of studies have examined the coupling between f-ions and adjacent paramagnetic transition metals or organic radicals. 1,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] Two factors make it challenging to quantify f-electron coupling. First, the magnetic moments of f-ions, except for f 7 -systems, are temperature dependent and highly anisotropic due to a combination of strong spin-orbit coupling and weak crystal fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16,33 The magnetically isolated analog has a very similar crystal field to the original f-ion pair but lacks the complicating effect of the coupling between the fions. The susceptibility of the magnetically isolated analog may be subtracted from the susceptibility of the coupled system to determine whether the coupling is ferromagnetic or antiferromagnetic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The closest contact in the ion-pair is between C(28) and C(36); it is 3.243 (4) Å. The closest contact distance in the ion-pair is 3.507(7) Å between C(11) and C (24). The N1-C11-C11-N1 torsion angle is 1.3(1)°.…”
Section: (Figure 222) This Implies That At High Temperatures the Mmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Mononuclear complexes of Gd 3+ are already known. Systems with ground state spin higher than 7 2 can be built up with multinuclear complexes involving Gd 3+ and other rare-earth or transition metal ions. Studies of such heteropolymetallic compounds have also been of great interest in modeling metaloenzymes and in understanding their magnetic properties [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction between Cu(II)-Ln(III) is ferromagnetic for Gd(III) and other rare-earth ions with greater than half-filled 4 f shell such as Dy(III) and Er(III). Below half filling, this interaction is antiferromagnetic and leads to low-spin ground state for systems such as Cu(II)-Ce(III) and Cu(II)-Eu(III) [7]. The situation remains the same when the Cu(II) is replaced by organic ligands like nitronyl nitroxide triazole which are essentially spin-1/2 carriers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%