Systematic key performance indicators for measuring modular integrated construction

Abstract

Modular integrated construction (MiC) has been introduced in high-rise construction for achieving sustainable development. As high-rise MiC disruptively transforms the construction process compared with conventional construction, it is imperative to systematically understand its performance, which however has not been sufficiently reported in previous literature. Therefore, this paper aims to develop a new framework of key performance indicators (KPIs) for project stakeholders to comprehensively measure and effectively benchmark the performance of high-rise MiC projects. This framework is developed based on the concept of sustainable construction that covers social, environmental and economic aspects. Through a comprehensive literature review, expert interviews, and a focus group meeting, 32 KPIs are established in the three sustainability aspects. An eight-step process is suggested for project stakeholders to adopt these KPIs to measure MiC performance in three tiers, i.e., overall building, off-site and on-site, and modular works. A case study is then presented which demonstrates that the framework is effective in measuring the sustainability of high-rise MiC and applicable for comparing MiC with conventional practices. The framework fills the knowledge gap of performance measurement on high-rise modular construction and contributes a methodological foundation for future quantitative benchmarking of MiC sustainability.

Maximizing project efficiency through construction prefabrication unveiling the benefits

“…With the implementation of these quality assurance dimensions, operational risks are avoided. Source: [67] To identify quality assurance dimensions being practiced at manufacturing units in off-site locations, key performance indicators are to be used to evaluate the timely performance ratio and practices adopted by front-line workers deployed within assembly units [68] . To meet standards, labor efficiencies are compared with quality guidelines to make improvements during the production phase.…”