2017
DOI: 10.2217/fon-2017-0072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic literature review of efficacy, safety and tolerability outcomes of chemotherapy regimens in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma

Abstract: Aim:Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare neuroendocrine, cutaneous malignancy with poor prognosis once metastasized. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review to assess clinical outcomes associated with chemotherapy regimens in metastatic MCC.>Materials & methods:Embase®, MEDLINE®, MEDLINE®-In-Process and CENTRAL were searched for studies published in January 2016.Results & conclusion:Overall, the literature on chemotherapy in patients with metastatic MCC is sparse, with most studies… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
102
0
25

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
102
0
25
Order By: Relevance
“…Until 2016, before the introduction of immunotherapy, the most common treatments for metastatic MCC not amenable to surgery were chemotherapeutic regimens often used for other small-cell carcinomas; these include platinum-based regimens, etoposide 130 , taxanes and anthracyclines, either alone or in various combinations. The rationale for this approach was the observation that MCC has a cell morphology similar to that of other small-cell carcinomas as well as the fact that this treatment led to clinically meaningful responses in a subset of patients with MCC; however, these responses were short-lived.…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Until 2016, before the introduction of immunotherapy, the most common treatments for metastatic MCC not amenable to surgery were chemotherapeutic regimens often used for other small-cell carcinomas; these include platinum-based regimens, etoposide 130 , taxanes and anthracyclines, either alone or in various combinations. The rationale for this approach was the observation that MCC has a cell morphology similar to that of other small-cell carcinomas as well as the fact that this treatment led to clinically meaningful responses in a subset of patients with MCC; however, these responses were short-lived.…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first study to report immune-checkpoint blockade using the anti-PD1 antibody pembrolizumab in patients with advanced-stage MCC, the response rate was 56% 136 . The rate of progression-free survival at 6 months was 67%, compared with 24% for chemotherapy, based on historical data 130,131 . These promising results led to the inclusion of pembrolizumab as a systemic therapy option for disseminated disease in the 2017 NCCN guidelines for MCC management 81 .…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of the histopathologic findings and resulting staging, lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiation therapy may follow. For metastatic MCC, cytotoxic chemotherapy including anthracyclines, platinums and/or etoposide and/or topotecan are utilized most commonly . Response rates to chemotherapy range from 20% to 61%, with higher response rates in the first‐line setting .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For metastatic MCC, cytotoxic chemotherapy including anthracyclines, platinums and/or etoposide and/or topotecan are utilized most commonly . Response rates to chemotherapy range from 20% to 61%, with higher response rates in the first‐line setting . Among responders, the duration of response is short, that is, less than 8 months in first and second line settings .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation