2020
DOI: 10.24083/apjhm.v15i1.311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Literature Review of My Health Record System

Abstract: Background: On 2010 Australia launched a personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR) later renamed and augmented by the My Health Record Act 2012 Cth. The main goal of the present systematic literature review was to assess if the system has improved Australia’s healthcare system according to the objectives stated by the federal government in the My Health Record Act 2012 Cth. Methods: This systematic literature review was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research conducted before and after the implementation of My Health Record suggests a range of issues that have affected rollout, similar to those observed in other countries with comparable personal health record systems [ 8 , 9 ]. Low levels of awareness and knowledge of the system were believed to have reduced the number of people opting in to My Health Record, as were concerns about privacy, security, and fears of unauthorised sharing or data misuse [ 1 , 3 , 10 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Research conducted before and after the implementation of My Health Record suggests a range of issues that have affected rollout, similar to those observed in other countries with comparable personal health record systems [ 8 , 9 ]. Low levels of awareness and knowledge of the system were believed to have reduced the number of people opting in to My Health Record, as were concerns about privacy, security, and fears of unauthorised sharing or data misuse [ 1 , 3 , 10 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…This set considered the following terms: “personal reputation,” “reputation of the individual,” “personal reputations,” "individuals' reputations,” “reputation of the person,” “reputation of persons”. This set of keywords used the Boolean operator “OR.” The authors decided not to use the Boolean operators “AND” and “NOT,” which restricted the number of results [ 36 ]. In this sense, the three databases offer many fields that filter the search results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adoption rates of these PAEHR services that used FDIs varied considerably around the world (Figure 2; [10,11,16,18,24,25,39,50,74,77,78,84,90,95,96,98,100,102,104,106]). Australia and Singapore had the highest and lowest adoption rates at 90% and 1.5%, respectively, and most countries had adoption rates below 30% [23,40].…”
Section: Adoption Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%