2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-7535(02)00020-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic occupational health and safety work in Norway: a decade of implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Company size is therefore an approximation, or proxy variable, for other variables affecting OHS performance. Øystein Saksvik, Torvatn, and Nytrø [ 42 ] point out that, though OHS is influenced by company size, it is the companies’ actual performance in terms of OHS management that is of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Company size is therefore an approximation, or proxy variable, for other variables affecting OHS performance. Øystein Saksvik, Torvatn, and Nytrø [ 42 ] point out that, though OHS is influenced by company size, it is the companies’ actual performance in terms of OHS management that is of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Work Environment Act of 1977 helped spur interest in occupational Danish health research, and this was followed by formation of the Danish Association of Occupational Medicine in 1984 (3). A Working Environment Act was also passed in Norway during 1977, and in 1992 it became mandatory for every Norwegian enterprise to establish a workplace health system, regardless of trade or size (4). A special Act on Occupational Health Services was passed in Finland during 1978, which obliged employers to organize these services for all employees (1).…”
Section: A History Of the Scandinavian Journal Of Work Environment Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Norwegian internal control regulations for Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) [30] requires systematic efforts to ensure HSE, including clear lines of responsibilities, mapping, and monitoring of hazards and risks and the compositions of measures to mitigate risk. The regulations are clearly inspired from general quality theory [31] and the idea of continuous improvement by means of the cyclic process of Plan-Do-Check-Act [32] is also made evident in international ISO standards. In health care, quality assurance systems may include external or internal audits, patient surveys, and reporting of adverse events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%