2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.11.175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic optimization of corrosion, bioactivity, and biocompatibility behaviors of calcium-phosphate plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) coatings on titanium substrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most popular micro-arc coatings today are based on calcium phosphates (brushite, hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate), calcium silicates (wollastonite, akermanite), etc. [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular micro-arc coatings today are based on calcium phosphates (brushite, hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate), calcium silicates (wollastonite, akermanite), etc. [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the biocompatibility was obtained either by addition of proper particles into the electrolyte [34,35] or by proper formulation of the electrolyte in order to directly form Hap during the treatment. In this second case, specific compounds should be added into the electrolyte, in particular Ca and P compounds as deeply studied by Molaei et al [36]. However, in literature, as reported for example in the comprehensive review work of Pesode et al [37] or in the book [38], PEO coatings on Ti alloys are produced at high voltages, between 500 and 800 V, with very high energy consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highly porous and rough surface coatings can be obtained after PEO due to the nature of the treatment. Besides the roughness, the porosity of the coating also significantly affects the spreading of water on contact angle measurements [93]. The pores on the surface can partially absorb the water resulting in a lower contact angle [94,95].…”
Section: Structural Characterizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%