2010
DOI: 10.3852/09-240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic reappraisal of species inPhomasectionParaphoma,PyrenochaetaandPleurophoma

Abstract: Sequence data from the 18S nrDNA (SSU) and 28S nrDNA (LSU) regions of isolates of Phoma section Paraphoma were compared with those of representative isolates of the morphologically similar anamorph genera Pleurophoma and Pyrenochaeta and of the type species of Phoma sections Phoma, Pilosa and Plenodomus. Phoma section Paraphoma was found to be highly polyphyletic within the Pleosporales and only distantly related to Phoma section Phoma. The genus Paraphoma, which is based on Paraphoma radicina, is reintroduced… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
156
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
156
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both fungi occurred more frequently in stems and twigs with advanced necroses. The former (anamorph: unknown) occurs on branches and bare wood of trees and shrubs (Sutton 1980;de Gruyter et al 2010). The latter is an anamorph of the discomycetous genus Tympanis (Johnston et al 2014).…”
Section: Occurrence Of Other Frequent Fungal Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both fungi occurred more frequently in stems and twigs with advanced necroses. The former (anamorph: unknown) occurs on branches and bare wood of trees and shrubs (Sutton 1980;de Gruyter et al 2010). The latter is an anamorph of the discomycetous genus Tympanis (Johnston et al 2014).…”
Section: Occurrence Of Other Frequent Fungal Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observations were made with a Zeiss V12 Discovery stereomicroscope (Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany), and with a Zeiss Axiophot light microscope using differential interference contrast (DIC) illumination and an AxioCam MRc5 and HR3 cameras. Fungi were classified and identified to the lowest taxonomic rank on the basis of anatomical and morphological features using the mycological keys or monographs (Grove 1935;Ellis 1971;Domsch et al 1980;Sutton 1980;Sivanesan 1984;Ellis and Ellis 1985;Spielman 1985;Uecker 1988;Boerema et al 2004;de Gruyter et al 2010). …”
Section: Identification Of Fungi On Dead Apical Parts Of Stems and Twigsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hand cut sections were made using a razor blade. The fungi were identified using the relevant literature (Saccardo 1882(Saccardo -1905Jazcevsky 1913Jazcevsky , 1917Grove 1935Grove , 1937Vassiljevsky & Karakulin 1950;Popushoj 1971;Tomilin 1979;Byzova, Vasyagina 1981;Smitskaja et al 1986;Huhndorf, Harris 1996;Ignatavičiūtė, Traigienė 1998;Mel'nik 2000;Azbukina 2005;Gruyter et al 2010;Braun and Cook 2012). Host plants were identified using the "Flora of Turkey and East Aegean Islands" (Davis 1965(Davis -1985.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strain B47-9 was isolated from barley. Although P. chrysanthemicola was originally isolated from Chrysanthemum morifolium 9 , P. chrysanthemicola MAFF244948, 244949, and 244950 examined here were isolated from Glycine soja, and MAFF245116 was isolated from Atractylodes lancea. Paraphoma radicina MAFF 244952 and MAFF 244953 examined here were isolated from Glycine soja.…”
Section: Molecular Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genus Paraphoma was characterized mainly based on consistent thickness of the entire pycnidial wall composed of uniformly shaped and compact cells and welldifferentiated setae densely spread over the pycnidial surface 8 . Moreover, based on molecular phylogenic analysis of the small subunit 18S rDNA SSU and large subunit 28S rDNA LSU regions, Paraphoma was reconfirmed as a distinct genus 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%