2022
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2121744119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic reduction of the dimensionality of natural scenes allows accurate predictions of retinal ganglion cell spike outputs

Abstract: The mammalian retina engages a broad array of linear and nonlinear circuit mechanisms to convert natural scenes into retinal ganglion cell (RGC) spike outputs. Although many individual integration mechanisms are well understood, we know less about how multiple mechanisms interact to encode the complex spatial features present in natural inputs. Here, we identified key spatial features in natural scenes that shape encoding by primate parasol RGCs. Our approach identified simplifications in the spatial structure… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, ON parasol cells showed more rectified nonlinearities compared to OFF, opposite of what is expected from finding in the macaque retina (Turner and Rieke, 2016). Midget cells also showed substantial rectification, consistent with findings in the peripheral macaque retina (Freedland and Rieke, 2022; Freeman et al, 2015). Cell-type-specific differences in nonlinear components were also prominent in the mouse retina ( Fig.…”
Section: The Nonlinear Receptive Field Captures Responses To Natural ...supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Interestingly, ON parasol cells showed more rectified nonlinearities compared to OFF, opposite of what is expected from finding in the macaque retina (Turner and Rieke, 2016). Midget cells also showed substantial rectification, consistent with findings in the peripheral macaque retina (Freedland and Rieke, 2022; Freeman et al, 2015). Cell-type-specific differences in nonlinear components were also prominent in the mouse retina ( Fig.…”
Section: The Nonlinear Receptive Field Captures Responses To Natural ...supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Specifically OFF parasol cells have been reported to respond to finely structured natural stimuli not captured with the LN model (Turner and Rieke 2016). Similar observations have been made in midget cells that were described better with a nonlinear receptive field (Freedland and Rieke 2022;J. Freeman et al 2015).…”
Section: P R I M At E Modelsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Parasol ganglion cells in the primate retina have been linked to nonlinear Y-cell physiology (Crook et al 2008a,b;Petrusca et al 2007) and their function was successfully described with subunit models Turner and Rieke 2016). Nonlinear responses in midget ganglion cells are less pronounced (Cafaro and Rieke 2013;Petrusca et al 2007), but were also modeled successfully (Freedland and Rieke 2022;J. Freeman et al 2015).…”
Section: Parasol and Midget Subunitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared the spiking activity of the model units to RGC activity across different animal species in response to natural images and movies. Here, we used publicly available recordings from the retina in macaque, marmoset, mouse and salamander [35][36][37]. We found our model to exhibit similar spike activity to the RGCs across each of these species.…”
Section: Retina-like Spike Statistics To Natural Images and Moviesmentioning
confidence: 99%