2024
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.55852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Suprascapular Notch Morphological Variability: Do We Know Everything?

George Tsakotos,
Răzvan C Tudose,
George Triantafyllou
et al.

Abstract: The suprascapular notch represents a depression on the lateral part of the superior border of the scapula, medially to the coracoid process. The current paper presents a systematic review with a meta-analysis of the suprascapular notch morphological variability. Related clinical implications were further discussed as well to emphasize the value of the topic. A total of 31 articles were included in the meta-analysis, which depicted great heterogeneity. Thus, due to the different classification systems, difficul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis commenced with Excel Descriptive Statistics to overview our subgroups, focusing on key statistical metrics. Subsequently, we employed Jamovi software (version 2.3.21.0) and R software (version 4.1.2) for detailed investigations [ 41 , 42 ], using one-way ANOVA and Games-Howell post-hoc tests to examine the impact of pneumatization types on IAC-JB distances. This approach allowed for both an initial assessment and an in-depth analysis of our data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis commenced with Excel Descriptive Statistics to overview our subgroups, focusing on key statistical metrics. Subsequently, we employed Jamovi software (version 2.3.21.0) and R software (version 4.1.2) for detailed investigations [ 41 , 42 ], using one-way ANOVA and Games-Howell post-hoc tests to examine the impact of pneumatization types on IAC-JB distances. This approach allowed for both an initial assessment and an in-depth analysis of our data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%