2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11282-022-00610-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review and meta-analysis of mandibular canal variations on cone beam computed tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…found that the incidence of an accessory or bifid mandibular canal was 38.00% [37]. In our present study, we found that the IAN may give off branches that course through accessory or bifid mandibular canals in 30.61% of the cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…found that the incidence of an accessory or bifid mandibular canal was 38.00% [37]. In our present study, we found that the IAN may give off branches that course through accessory or bifid mandibular canals in 30.61% of the cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…When undergoing surgery involving the mental foramen region, the presence of the submental foramen may lead to complications such as poor anesthesia, intraoperative bleeding, and nerve injury 3,8) . Studies have shown that the rate of submental foramen was 2%-10.7% [8][9][10] and the average diameter of the accessory mental foramen was 0.93 mm 10) . The CBCT measurements by Naitoh et al found that the mental foramen was elliptical, with a diameter of 1.1-2.9 mm and an average of 1.9 mm 11) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vast majority of diagnostic and therapeutic applications in the field of dentistry require the use of this technology, which is primarily used for pathological examination of tooth roots, such as periapical [ 169 ] and root resorption [ 170 ], pathological imaging of the dental pulp, such as root canal therapy, imaging of bones in cranial segments, such as the mandible [ 92 , 93 ], and soft tissue evaluation, such as the gingiva [ 94 ]. It is worth noting that radiation exposure is its most significant feature compared to other techniques.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%