2011
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Association Between Complement Component 3 and Age-related Macular Degeneration: A HuGE Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: The authors performed a meta-analysis to estimate the magnitude of polymorphism effects for the complement component C3 gene (C3) and their possible mode of action on age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The meta-analysis included 16 and 7 studies for rs2230199 and rs1047286, respectively. Data extraction and risk of bias assessments were performed in duplicate, and heterogeneity and publication bias were explored. There was moderate evidence for association between both polymorphisms and AMD in Caucasians.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
102
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
3
102
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In our data, we detected variants that have previously been associated with disease in man. For instance, rs1047286 showing an association with peptide levels in the C3 gene, has previously been associated with increased risk of age-related macular degeneration (24). The peptide with an amino acid change caused by this polymorphism was detected in our data (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In our data, we detected variants that have previously been associated with disease in man. For instance, rs1047286 showing an association with peptide levels in the C3 gene, has previously been associated with increased risk of age-related macular degeneration (24). The peptide with an amino acid change caused by this polymorphism was detected in our data (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The quality of each study was assessed by the same two investigators using the quality assessment criteria, which was modified on the basis of previously published metaanalysis of molecular association studies (Thakkinstian et al, 2011;Yu et al, 2012). The criteria consist of seven parameters of quality: representativeness of the cases, representativeness of the controls, ascertainment of bladder cancers, control selection, genotyping examination, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, and total sample size (The criteria are described in detail in Table 1).…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study quality was assessed using a risk-of-bias score for genetic association studies developed by Thakkinstian et al (2011) (Table S1). The assessment considered five domains: information bias, confounding bias, selective reporting of outcomes, population stratification, and assessment of HWE in the control group.…”
Section: Assessment Of Bias Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%