2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of reproductive management practices used to induce resumption of ovarian cyclical activity in anestrous does

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We used subgroup meta‐analyses to aggregate independent studies first at the national level and second at the regional level according to the seven regions defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) (WHO, 2003): sub‐Saharan Africa, Middle East and North Africa, North America, Latin America and the Caribbean, Europe and Central Asia, South Asia and East Asia and Pacific. As described elsewhere (Diaz et al., 2019; Romo‐Barron et al., 2019), we used a significance test for overall effect with z statistic (effect size = 0) and assessed significant heterogeneity across trials with Cochran's Q statistic ( X 2 test). Finally, we used the I 2 statistic to determine the proportion of variation in the effects due to variations in true effects rather than sampling error (Borenstein et al., 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used subgroup meta‐analyses to aggregate independent studies first at the national level and second at the regional level according to the seven regions defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) (WHO, 2003): sub‐Saharan Africa, Middle East and North Africa, North America, Latin America and the Caribbean, Europe and Central Asia, South Asia and East Asia and Pacific. As described elsewhere (Diaz et al., 2019; Romo‐Barron et al., 2019), we used a significance test for overall effect with z statistic (effect size = 0) and assessed significant heterogeneity across trials with Cochran's Q statistic ( X 2 test). Finally, we used the I 2 statistic to determine the proportion of variation in the effects due to variations in true effects rather than sampling error (Borenstein et al., 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F I G U R E 6 Forest plot showing the impact direction of studies in Group 5 allows for eliminating inconsistencies in individual studies to make stronger and more accurate estimates for the effect size of the population. These estimates also find a place in veterinary medicine and are widely applied in this field (Diaz et al, 2019;Palacin et al, 2011;Yan et al, 2016). This study evaluated both the effect of different synchronization methods applied to sheep on pregnancy rates and the inseason and out-of-season status of sheep in each subgroup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…]4) to which the NTS isolates were resistant and aggregated the studies by the type of sample. The overall effect of the model was assessed with the z statistic assuming an effect size = 0, whereas the Cochran's Q statistic (X 2 test) was used to assess significant heterogeneity across trials and theI 2 statistic was used to measure the proportion of variation in the effects caused by heterogeneity in the true effects rather than sampling error (Diaz et al, 2019;Romo-Barron et al, 2019). All analyses were performed on Stata 12 (StataCorp, TX, USA) and the graphs were constructed on Prism 9 (GraphPad Inc., CA, USA).…”
Section: Summary Measures and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%