2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Perineural Catheters in Major Lower Limb Amputations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interview participants reported the PNC was effective in relieving postoperative pain. This supports quantitative findings that PNC use may significantly reduce opioid consumption 14 15. Participants particularly valued receiving localised, continuous analgesia, and found the placement of the PNC acceptable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interview participants reported the PNC was effective in relieving postoperative pain. This supports quantitative findings that PNC use may significantly reduce opioid consumption 14 15. Participants particularly valued receiving localised, continuous analgesia, and found the placement of the PNC acceptable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…There is evidence to suggest that placement of a perineural catheter (PNC) adjacent to a major nerve at the time of amputation, delivering a continuous infusion of local anaesthetic to the surgical site, may be effective in reducing acute pain following major lower limb amputation (amputation at a level above the ankle joint). A review and meta-analyses14 15 showed opioid consumption was significantly lower among patients receiving a PNC following amputation than among controls. However, the authors noted that the quality of available evidence was low, indicating a need for a randomised controlled trial to fully establish the efficacy of the PNC in reducing acute pain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40,41 Soaker catheters with intermittent administration of local anaesthetics into the surgical site over a period of days following surgery are considered to provide extended periods of local analgesia. [42][43][44] We found that in this population of dogs, highintensity analgesic support (as defined in our approach) was strongly and significantly associated with prolonged overall survival. Given that all dogs had undergone limb amputation, this suggests a difference in time to metastasis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Longer acting liposomal formulations of bupivacaine are now available; that formulation was infrequently used in the cases reported herein and while we acknowledge the duration of analgesia may have been longer than dogs treated with tissue infiltration of lidocaine or bupivacaine, dogs treated with liposomal formulations of bupivacaine as tissue infiltrations were placed in the low analgesic group 40,41 . Soaker catheters with intermittent administration of local anaesthetics into the surgical site over a period of days following surgery are considered to provide extended periods of local analgesia 42–44 . We found that in this population of dogs, high‐intensity analgesic support (as defined in our approach) was strongly and significantly associated with prolonged overall survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is likely this difference reflects the difference of literature evaluating these two catheter-based techniques, however lack of expertise was the commonest reason reported in the survey. [4][5][6] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%