Systematic review and meta-analysis of community pharmacy error rates in the USA: 1993–2015

Abstract

ImportanceWhile much is known about hospital pharmacy error rates in the USA, comparatively little is known about community pharmacy dispensing error rates.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the rate of community pharmacy dispensing errors in the USA.MethodsEnglish language, peer-reviewed observational and interventional studies that reported community pharmacy dispensing error rates in the USA from January 1993 to December 2015 were identified in 10 bibliographic databases and topic-relevant grey literature. Studies with a denominator reflecting the total number of prescriptions in the sample were necessary for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate an aggregate community pharmacy dispensing error rate. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic prior to analysis.ResultsThe search yielded a total of 8490 records, of which 11 articles were included in the systematic review. Two articles did not have adequate data components to be included in the meta-analysis. Dispensing error rates ranged from 0.00003% (43/1 420 091) to 55% (55/100). The meta-analysis included 1 461 128 prescriptions. The overall community pharmacy dispensing error rate was estimated to be 0.015 (95% CI 0.014 to 0.018); however, significant heterogeneity was observed across studies (I2=99.6). Stratification by study error identification methodology was found to have a significant impact on dispensing error rate (p<0.001).Conclusion and relevanceThere are few published articles that describe community pharmacy dispensing error rates in the USA. Thus, there is limited information about the current rate of community pharmacy dispensing errors. A robust investigation is needed to assess dispensing error rates in the USA to assess the nature and magnitude of the problem and establish prevention strategies.

Mathematical Models as Tools to Predict the Release Kinetic of Fluorescein from Lyotropic Colloidal Liquid Crystals

“…The linear regression of formulations (1–5) demonstrated that the data had the same trend and similar r 2 values ( Supplementary Figure S1 ), while the t -test significance of results was calculated by comparing the equations reported earlier ( Supplementary Information ) [ 68 ].…”

Dispensing errors in Lebanese community pharmacies: incidence, types, underlying causes, and associated factors

“…Various rates of dispensing errors ranging between 0.04 and 55% have been reported in the literature. 13 - 23 However, it is challenging to compare reported rates of dispensing errors directly across studies, owing to differences in study design, methodology, operational procedures, denominators (such as total numbers of prescriptions, numbers of dispensed doses, or numbers of prescribed medications), as well as dispensing practices. Moreover, although this rate is low, it should still be considered because it can translate into many errors due to the high volumes of medications dispensed each day by community pharmacies.…”

“… 12 The rates of dispensing errors were estimated to range between 0.04-55% depending on the study setting, method, and operational definitions. 13 - 23…”

Looking Back at US Pharmacy’s Past to Help Discern Its Future

“…The dispensing error rate in US community pharmacies has been reported to be 1.5%. 129 With 5.8 billion prescriptions dispensed in the United States in 2018, nearly 240 000 dispensing errors occur daily. 76 Automated dispensing, as already successfully demonstrated by a fully robotic hospital pharmacy in San Francisco, can bring that error rate to zero.…”