2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2021.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis: Efficacy and Safety of Second-Generation Antipsychotics in Youths With Bipolar Depression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients 1 and 3 received lurasidone as the first choice option, while for patients 2 and 4, lurasidone was prescribed after previous antipsychotic treatments. These results are in line with previous observations, in which lurasidone is an effective treatment option for both antipsychoticnaïve adolescents diagnosed with schizophrenia and adolescents previously treated with antipsychotic medication, on positive and negative symptoms [55][56][57], with greater efficacy in the drug-naive patient group than patients previously treated. Costamagna et al, noted an onset of improvement on lurasidone as early as week 1, and it was consistently observed from weeks 2 to 6 across the 40-160-mg/d dose range in 537 adolescents and young adults with schizophrenia in pooled post hoc analysis of double-blind, placebo-controlled 6-week studies [58].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Patients 1 and 3 received lurasidone as the first choice option, while for patients 2 and 4, lurasidone was prescribed after previous antipsychotic treatments. These results are in line with previous observations, in which lurasidone is an effective treatment option for both antipsychoticnaïve adolescents diagnosed with schizophrenia and adolescents previously treated with antipsychotic medication, on positive and negative symptoms [55][56][57], with greater efficacy in the drug-naive patient group than patients previously treated. Costamagna et al, noted an onset of improvement on lurasidone as early as week 1, and it was consistently observed from weeks 2 to 6 across the 40-160-mg/d dose range in 537 adolescents and young adults with schizophrenia in pooled post hoc analysis of double-blind, placebo-controlled 6-week studies [58].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The key secondary efficacy endpoint was mean change from baseline to week 6 in the Clinical Global Impressions Bipolar Scale (CGI-BP-S) assessment, which rates severity of depression on a 7-point scale. 20 Additional secondary efficacy assessments included the 16-item, self-rated Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR 16 ), 21 Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), 22 Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), 23 and Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF). 24…”
Section: Efficacy Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of patients in the combined adjunctive groups who met a priori responder criteria was significantly higher for treatment with lurasidone versus placebo on the week 6 observed case analysis (61.8% vs 44.3%; P < 0.001; NNT = 6 [95% CI, 3-13]) and on the week 6 LOCF-endpoint analysis (55.0% vs 39.6%; P = 0.001; NNT = 7 [95% CI, [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]). The proportion of patients in the combined adjunctive groups who met remission criteria (MADRS ≤8) was significantly higher for treatment with lurasidone versus placebo on the week 6 observed case analysis (43.7% vs 23.2%; P < 0.0001; NNT = 5 [95% CI, 3-9]) and on the week 6 LOCF-endpoint analysis (37.6% vs 20.4%; P < 0.0001; NNT = 6 [95% CI, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]).…”
Section: Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations