2001
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review concerning the age of introduction of complementary foods to the healthy full-term infant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
73
0
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
73
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The evidence base for many infant-feeding recommendations is currently limited (Michaelsen et al 2000;Lanigan et al 2001;Kramer & Kakuma, 2002). For example, a review on the possible adequacy of breast milk to meet energy and nutrient requirements up to the age of 6 months noted a lack of published evidence on infant energy intake with which to address this question and called for further research (Butte et al 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The evidence base for many infant-feeding recommendations is currently limited (Michaelsen et al 2000;Lanigan et al 2001;Kramer & Kakuma, 2002). For example, a review on the possible adequacy of breast milk to meet energy and nutrient requirements up to the age of 6 months noted a lack of published evidence on infant energy intake with which to address this question and called for further research (Butte et al 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We were also aware that many implicit but important assumptions (about breast-milk transfer, metabolisability and energy content, for example) have commonly been made in the literature, and these assumptions have been repeated and widely used in infant-feeding recommendations. The assumptions have not generally been formally tested, and it is widely recognised that more evidencebased approaches to the issue would be helpful (Michaelsen et al 2000;Lanigan et al 2001;Kramer & Kakuma, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The introduction of solid foods to complement human milk or infant formula or both (ie the weaning process), is recognised as one of the most crucial dietary events in an infant's life (Lanigan et al, 2001). If the process is begun too early this may cause development of allergic disease or obesity, while if there is a delay, this may induce failure to thrive or iron-deficiency anaemia (DoH, 1994;Wilson et al, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there have been questions as to whether these recommendations apply to developed countries where the risks from episodes of gastroenteritis are minimal [43,49,53] and whether infants who are weaned before six months are at risk of micronutrient deficiencies [43,63]. There are no reported disadvantages in beginning to wean infants onto solid foods between four and six months in developed countries [27].…”
Section: Timing Of Weaningmentioning
confidence: 99%