2015
DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsu117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Review: Mealtime Behavior Measures Used in Pediatric Chronic Illness Populations

Abstract: Overall, the literature of pediatric mealtime assessment tools shows a strong evidence base for many direct observation methods and subjective parent-report measures. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses are available for some measures; recommendations for future validation research and measure development across pediatric populations are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we did not investigate eating habits and food presentation within families. This could be particularly relevant for studies evaluating eating preferences in children with ASD and can be registered with specific mealtime behavior questionnaires [77]. Moreover, our methodology for defining dietary intake was based on a parent version of a modified FFQ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we did not investigate eating habits and food presentation within families. This could be particularly relevant for studies evaluating eating preferences in children with ASD and can be registered with specific mealtime behavior questionnaires [77]. Moreover, our methodology for defining dietary intake was based on a parent version of a modified FFQ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we were interested in coding specific strategies and behaviours, whereas the MICS examines overall family functioning more broadly. Conversely, the DINE does provide a scheme for coding specific behaviours but does not specify between preferred and non-preferred foods and lacks codes for child food exploration (Poppert et al, 2015). Because targeted food acceptance and the ability to interact with and explore novel food are central to the clinical treatment of SFA, it was crucial that we used a system that reliably coded these behaviours.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confirmatory factor analyses show scale consistency ranging from (.78 -.87). Poppert and colleagues rate the AYCE as a well-established measure (Poppert et al, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%