Systematic review of augmented reality in urological interventions: the evidences of an impact on surgical outcomes are yet to come

Bertolo, Riccardo; Hung, Andrew J.; Porpiglia, Francesco; Bove, Pierluigi; Schleicher, Mary; Dasgupta, Prokar

doi:10.1007/s00345-019-02711-z

Cited by 50 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…11,15 An additional step towards the precise medicine and imaging-guided surgery is the adoption of augmented reality (AR) in different surgical interventions. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] During PN, the AR technology can facilitate a rapid and accurate anatomic identification of the renal vasculature.…”

Section: Clinical Practice Pointsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Augmented Reality to Guide Selective Clamping and Tumor Dissection During Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Preliminary Experience

Schiavina

Bianchi

Chessa

et al. 2021

Clinical Genitourinary Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Clinical Practice Pointsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Augmented Reality to Guide Selective Clamping and Tumor Dissection During Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Preliminary Experience

Schiavina

Bianchi

Chessa

et al. 2021

Clinical Genitourinary Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…There are also few published studies about the feasibility and safety of AR-assisted urological surgery using smart glasses [50,51]. Bertolo et al [52] stressed that, based on the existing evidence, they were unable to state that AR improved the outcomes of urological interventions. They thought the major limitation of AR-assisted surgery was inaccuracy in registration, translating into a poor navigation precision.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review of the effect of 3D medical printing and virtual reality on urology training with ‘MedTRain3DModsim’ Erasmus + European Union Project

Tatar¹,

Hurі²,

Selçuk³

et al. 2019

Turk J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/aim: It is necessary to incorporate novel training modalities in medical education, especially in surgical fields, because of the limitations of cadaveric training. Traditional medical education has many drawbacks, such as residency working hour restrictions, patient safety conflicts with the learning needs, and the lack of hands-on workshops. The MedTRain3DModsim Project aimed to produce 3-dimensional (3D) medical printed models, simulations, and innovative applications for every level of medical training using novel worldwide technologies. It was aimed herein to improve the interdisciplinary and transnational approaches, and accumulate existing experience for medical education, postgraduate studies, and specialty training. Materials and methods: This project focused on models of solid organs and the urinary system, including the kidney, prostate, ureter, and liver. With 3D medical printing, it is possible to produce a body part from inert materials in just a few hours with the standardization of medical 3D modeling. Results: The target groups of this project included medical students and residents, graduate students from engineering departments who needed medical education and surgical training, and medical researchers interested in health technology or clinical and surgical anatomy. Conclusion: It was also intended to develop a novel imaging platform for education and training by reevaluating the existing data using new software and 3D modalities. Therefore, it was believed that our methodology could be implemented in all related medical fields.

show abstract

“…In the health care sector, AR is used in medical training [3][4][5], for surgical interventions [6,7], in nursing [8], in rehabilitation [1], in emergency medicine [2,9], and as a therapeutic aid [10]. In health education, it is used in a wide range of subjects (eg, surgery, forensic medicine, anatomy, clinical life support, cardiology) [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of the Use of Augmented Reality in Teaching the Management of Anaphylactic Shock at the Primary Care Level: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Klemenc–Ketiš¹,

Susič²,

Gorenjec³

et al. 2021

JMIR Res Protoc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Augmented reality (AR) has benefits and feasibility in emergency medicine, especially in the clinical care of patients, in operating rooms and inpatient facilities, and in the education and training of emergency care providers, but current research on this topic is sparse. Objective The primary objective is to evaluate the short-term and long-term effectiveness of the use of AR in the treatment of patients with anaphylactic shock. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the safety in the treatment of patients with anaphylactic shock, evaluate the short-term and long-term effectiveness of stress management in this process, and determine the experiences and attitudes towards the use of AR in education. Methods The study will be conducted in 3 phases. In the first phase, we will develop and test the scenario for simulation of anaphylactic shock and the evaluation scale for assessing the effect of the intervention. In the second phase, a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial will be conducted. In the third phase, the use of AR in teaching the management of anaphylactic shock using focus groups will be evaluated qualitatively. All participants will participate in a 1-day training program consisting of a lecture on emergency care and anaphylactic shock as well as exercises in manual dexterity (aspiration, airway management, alternative airway management, artificial respiration, chest compressions, safe defibrillation, oxygen application, use of medication during emergency care). The test group will also focus on education about anaphylactic shock in AR (the intervention). The main outcome will be the evaluation of the participants' performance in coping with a simulated scenario of anaphylactic shock using a high-fidelity simulator (simulator with high levels of realism) and a standardized patient in an educational and clinical environment. The study will be conducted with primary care physicians. Results A scenario for the simulation with a high-fidelity simulator and standardized patient has already been developed. For the time being, we are developing an evaluation scale and starting to recruit participants. We plan to complete the recruitment of participants by the end of December 2020, start the randomized controlled trial in January 2021, and finish 1 year later. The first results are expected to be submitted for publication in 2021. Conclusions This will be the first study to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of AR in medical teaching. Specifically, it will be based on a clinical case of anaphylactic shock at the primary care level. With our study, we also want to evaluate the translation of these educational results into clinical practice and assess their long-term impact. Trial Registration ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN58047410; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN58047410 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) ...

show abstract

Systematic review of augmented reality in urological interventions: the evidences of an impact on surgical outcomes are yet to come

Cited by 50 publications

References 40 publications

Augmented Reality to Guide Selective Clamping and Tumor Dissection During Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Preliminary Experience

Augmented Reality to Guide Selective Clamping and Tumor Dissection During Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Preliminary Experience

Review of the effect of 3D medical printing and virtual reality on urology training with ‘MedTRain3DModsim’ Erasmus + European Union Project

Effectiveness of the Use of Augmented Reality in Teaching the Management of Anaphylactic Shock at the Primary Care Level: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About