Systematic review of control groups in nutrition education intervention research

Abstract

BackgroundWell-designed research trials are critical for determining the efficacy and effectiveness of nutrition education interventions. To determine whether behavioral and/or cognition changes can be attributed to an intervention, the experimental design must include a control or comparison condition against which outcomes from the experimental group can be compared. Despite the impact different types of control groups can have on study outcomes, the treatment provided to participants in the control condition has received limited attention in the literature.MethodsA systematic review of control groups in nutrition education interventions was conducted to better understand how control conditions are described in peer-reviewed journal articles compared with experimental conditions. To be included in the systematic review, articles had to be indexed in CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, WoS, and/or ERIC and report primary research findings of controlled nutrition education intervention trials conducted in the United States with free-living consumer populations and published in English between January 2005 and December 2015. Key elements extracted during data collection included treatment provided to the experimental and control groups (e.g., overall intervention content, tailoring methods, delivery mode, format, duration, setting, and session descriptions, and procedures for standardizing, fidelity of implementation, and blinding); rationale for control group type selected; sample size and attrition; and theoretical foundation.ResultsThe search yielded 43 publications; about one-third of these had an inactive control condition, which is considered a weak study design. Nearly two-thirds of reviewed studies had an active control condition considered a stronger research design; however, many failed to report one or more key elements of the intervention, especially for the control condition. None of the experimental and control group treatments were sufficiently detailed to permit replication of the nutrition education interventions studied.ConclusionsFindings advocate for improved intervention study design and more complete reporting of nutrition education interventions.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-017-0546-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The impact of worksite interventions promoting healthier food and/or physical activity habits among employees working ‘around the clock’ hours: a systematic review

“…In future studies in this field, it is, therefore, important to consider more objective outcome parameters. Further, offering an active control condition, as opposed to no treatment control, may facilitate blinding ( 53 ). Another major issue possibly contributing to bias in the assessment of outcomes common in the now reviewed studies was an imbalance in baseline characteristics.…”

Fruit and vegetable intakes in relation to behavioral outcomes associated with a nutrition education intervention in preschoolers

“…To overcome the latter, the study design needs to include a control group against which outcomes from the experimental group can be compared in order to minimize biases and variability of factors that may affect intervention outcomes, as well as to determine whether behavioral changes can be attributed to a dietary intervention. The control and experimental conditions must be applied simultaneously to guarantee both groups experience the same conditions such as physical growth [ 20 ]. Without such controls, there is a possibility that changes in the intake of fruits and vegetables as well as in behavioral outcomes may due to the physical growth of children; although the pre-intervention consumptions of fruits and vegetables were not different among the tertiles of the total behavioral scores in the present study.…”

Nutrition and Culinary in the Kitchen Program: a randomized controlled intervention to promote cooking skills and healthy eating in university students – study protocol

“…When the control group waits until the study concludes to receive the intervention it can present limitations. During the waiting period, they may have experiences that may impact study outcomes [ 68 ]. Nevertheless, randomization procedures within the study groups remain the only method that could eliminate possible selection and confounding biases [ 69 ].…”