2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-014-1541-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Review of Definitions of Failure in Revisional Bariatric Surgery

Abstract: The majority of published studies do not define failure of bariatric surgery, and <50 % excess weight loss at 18 months was the most frequent definition identified.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
49
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…One limitation of this study is the lack of established definition of weight regain in the current literature 44. Our study uses a cut-off of 15% or greater as the definition of significant weight regain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One limitation of this study is the lack of established definition of weight regain in the current literature 44. Our study uses a cut-off of 15% or greater as the definition of significant weight regain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bariatric surgery has been considered to be successful, regarding weight loss, when patients were able to lose more than 50 % of their excess weight [6]. This happened in more than 85 % of our patients (Table 1), and the most important thing is that the same weight loss was maintained for at least 10 years of followup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Body fat was assessed by TANITA TBF-300A Body Composition Analyzer (TANITA Corporation, Japan). Bariatric surgery was considered successful if patients reached at least 50 % of %EWL [6] and/or patients achieved a BMI lower than 35 kg/m 2 (Table 1). Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) questionnaire was carried out to assess the efficacy of the bariatric procedure, and scores higher than 3 were considered to have very good or excellent results [7,8].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most frequently used definition of failure of the initial operation is <50% of excess weight lost (EWL), with or without a BMI of >35 m/ kg² at 18 months post-operatively. [4] None of the reviewed articles described failure of remission of type 2 diabetes or hypertension as an indication for reoperation.…”
Section: Motivation and Indication For Revisional Bariatric Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%