2015
DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2014.08.0184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review of effects of current transtibial prosthetic socket designs—Part 2: Quantitative outcomes

Abstract: Abstract-This review is an attempt to untangle the complexity of transtibial prosthetic socket fit and perhaps find some indication of whether a particular prosthetic socket type might be best for a given situation. In addition, we identified knowledge gaps, thus providing direction for possible future research. We followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, using medical subject headings and standard key words to search for articles in relevant database… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, footwear may substantially affect regional and overall stiffness and damping of prosthetic feet, in some instances normalizing the mechanical function across designs 35, 37, 39, 70 . Additionally, the choice of suspension system and constituent components 71 will play a role in determining the residuum-prosthesis interface properties and behavior 72, 73 , and this is especially relevant with the advent of bone-anchored prostheses (osseointegration) 74 . Therefore, a first application of the optimization process relates to evidence-based practice.…”
Section: Optimizing Passive Prosthesis Design Through Parametric Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, footwear may substantially affect regional and overall stiffness and damping of prosthetic feet, in some instances normalizing the mechanical function across designs 35, 37, 39, 70 . Additionally, the choice of suspension system and constituent components 71 will play a role in determining the residuum-prosthesis interface properties and behavior 72, 73 , and this is especially relevant with the advent of bone-anchored prostheses (osseointegration) 74 . Therefore, a first application of the optimization process relates to evidence-based practice.…”
Section: Optimizing Passive Prosthesis Design Through Parametric Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the disadvantages of a PTB prosthesis, a TSB prosthesis has been widely used for the stability of suspension via a silicon liner with a pin-attachment locked-adapter, which can coordinate the precise muscle force-generated as an increase in muscle strength during voluntary thigh muscle contractions. A TSB prosthesis with vacuum-assisted suction sockets may improve gait symmetry, residual limb activity [48]; therefore, we assumed that a TSB prosthesis with good fixation by a socket-silicon linear connecting thigh-stump may improve functional voluntary thigh muscle force/power during knee extension compared with a PTB prosthesis. Consequently, it was seen that proper thigh-stump muscle contraction induced LBF increases through stability with thigh stump exercise.…”
Section: Possible Explanation For the Difference In Exercising Lbf Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the recent research efforts in this field, no fully satisfactory technological solutions exist at present. A comparison between the existing sockets, analyzing their merits and drawbacks, has been made by Safari et al [6], Al-Fakin et al [7] and Chatterjee et al [8] concerning transtibial prostheses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%