2021
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01114-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review of experiences and perceptions of key actors and organisations at multiple levels within health systems internationally in responding to COVID-19

Abstract: Background COVID-19 has presented challenges to healthcare systems and healthcare professionals internationally. After one year of the pandemic, the initial evidence on health system responses begins to consolidate, and there is a need to identify and synthesise experiences of responding to COVID-19 among healthcare professionals and other health system stakeholders. This systematic review of primary qualitative studies depicts the experiences and perceptions of organisations and actors at mult… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
52
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
4
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings support the concept that COVID-19 gave “permission” to introduce innovations [ 32 ]; implementation of workforce change was underpinned by the coordinating role of system-wide actors and managerial focus on working conditions on the front-line of care delivery. The latter has been documented in qualitative research worldwide [ 33 ]. However, given that COVID-19 has represented a pressing and severe threat to life, and health system responses have been subject to intense public and media scrutiny, it is not clear whether these aspects of the motivating context of change associated with COVID-19 will be sustained over time or generalisable to other contexts of care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings support the concept that COVID-19 gave “permission” to introduce innovations [ 32 ]; implementation of workforce change was underpinned by the coordinating role of system-wide actors and managerial focus on working conditions on the front-line of care delivery. The latter has been documented in qualitative research worldwide [ 33 ]. However, given that COVID-19 has represented a pressing and severe threat to life, and health system responses have been subject to intense public and media scrutiny, it is not clear whether these aspects of the motivating context of change associated with COVID-19 will be sustained over time or generalisable to other contexts of care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sampling framework was developed in order to guide recruitment which included different professional groups, levels of seniority and gender. The final sample included Anaesthetists (8), Emergency Department Doctor (1), Intensive Care Doctor (1), General Physician (1), Surgeons (5), Nurses (4), Healthcare Assistant (1), Services Manager (1) and Allied Health Professionals (3). The surgical specialties included orthopaedics (1), cardiothoracics (1), obstetrics and gynaecology (1) and general surgery (2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors' affiliations 1 Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, UK. 2 Rapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal Lab (RREAL), University College London, London, UK.…”
Section: Competing Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other research has considered such relationships at the local level 42 but further research is needed on the coordination of national level responses. 32,43 Our study only focussed on senior level stakeholders. Perspectives and experiences of intersectoral collaboration from medium and lower-level roles within universities, the private sector, and health system have been neglected.…”
Section: Limitations and Further Studymentioning
confidence: 99%