Systematic Review of Motives for Episodic Volunteering

Abstract

Although episodic volunteers are a critical resource for many organisations, their motives for volunteering are poorly understood. A systematic review was conducted to describe empirical evidence about motives for episodic volunteering (EV) across sectors (sport, tourism, events, health and social welfare). Identified EV motives were then categorised using core functions from the Volunteer Functions Inventory (VFI) for comparison across studies. Twelve databases (1990–December 2014) were searched. Thirty-three English language studies included results describing EV motives. Studies were predominantly cross-sectional, quantitative, event-based and originating in North America. Measurement of motives was also inconsistent. Common motives were helping others and socialising. Physical challenge and healing motives were specific to sport-based events and charity sport events, respectively. Over 80 % of motives were classified using VFI functions, particularly enhancement, values and social functions. The VFI supplemented by qualitative work may be efficacious to further identify EV motives and retention strategies

Exploring Engagement Characteristics and Behaviours of Environmental Volunteers

“…Research has long shown much variation in the length of time that a person commits to engaging in volunteering and citizen science activities relating to a number of internal and external factors including intrinsic motivation, time availability, and type of volunteer project (Macduff 2005;Nov et al 2011;Dunn et al 2016). Understanding volunteers' longevity behaviours is important for overall project management in relation to the sustainability and continuity of their practices, adequacy of recruitment and retention, and the allocation of resources (e.g., equipment and training) (Nov et al 2011;Chu et al 2012).…”

Satisfaction, organizational commitment and future action in charity sport event volunteers

“…Given the largely atheoretical nature of episodic and CSE volunteering research (Dunn et al , ; Hyde et al , ), this study draws from two theoretical frameworks validated in volunteering research outside of the CSE context, which may be of relevance to address the gaps identified. First, the volunteer process model (Snyder & Omoto, ) proposes key volunteering constructs and links these constructs in three sequential phases: antecedents to volunteering (e.g.…”

“…satisfaction, connection to the CSE host) and the factors that may contribute to this; and (ii) the need to consider constructs, in addition to motives, that predict CSE volunteer retention and behaviours that are supportive of CSEs and organizations hosting CSEs. Given the largely atheoretical nature of episodic and CSE volunteering research (Dunn et al, 2015;Hyde et al, 2014), this study draws from two theoretical frameworks validated in volunteering research outside of the CSE context, which may be of relevance to address the gaps identified. First, the volunteer process model (Snyder & Omoto, 2008) proposes key volunteering constructs and links these constructs in three sequential phases: antecedents to volunteering (e.g.…”

Volunteering research in Australia: A narrative review

“…Thus, volunteering is a specific type of a helping behaviour that has clear boundaries. Furthermore, for the purposes of this review, volunteering is conceptualised as a proactive activity that entails some commitment of time and effort, rather than reactive such as spontaneous volunteering, reviewed elsewhere (Dunn, Chambers, & Hyde, ; Whittaker et al, ). In the 2016 census, 3.62 million of Australians (19% of the population aged 15 years and over) indicated that they were engaged in voluntary work through an organisation or group .…”