2014
DOI: 10.1111/jar.12094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Review of Restraint Interventions for Challenging Behaviour Among Persons with Intellectual Disabilities: Focus on Effectiveness in Single‐Case Experiments

Abstract: The RIs reported on in the SCEs were on average highly effective in reducing CB for people with intellectual disabilities, and this reduction in CB was statistically significant. However, the effects vary significantly over the included participants, and the published data and reported outcomes are rather unrepresentative of the everyday use of RIs among persons with intellectual disabilities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
52
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
(80 reference statements)
5
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion corresponds to the findings of other meta-analyses published in this domain: Behavioral treatments are on average effective in reducing problem behavior in individuals with autism (e.g., Didden et al, 2006;Harvey et al, 2009;Heyvaert, Maes, & Onghena, 2010;Heyvaert, Maes, Van den Noortgate, Kuppens, & Onghena, 2012;Heyvaert, Saenen, Maes, & Onghena, 2014;Scotti et al, 1991;Vanderkerken, Heyvaert, Maes, & Onghena, 2013). However, for PZD the mean averages at the participant and study level indicated questionable treatment effects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This conclusion corresponds to the findings of other meta-analyses published in this domain: Behavioral treatments are on average effective in reducing problem behavior in individuals with autism (e.g., Didden et al, 2006;Harvey et al, 2009;Heyvaert, Maes, & Onghena, 2010;Heyvaert, Maes, Van den Noortgate, Kuppens, & Onghena, 2012;Heyvaert, Saenen, Maes, & Onghena, 2014;Scotti et al, 1991;Vanderkerken, Heyvaert, Maes, & Onghena, 2013). However, for PZD the mean averages at the participant and study level indicated questionable treatment effects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, most clinical use of physical restraints is for physical aggression, but there is only limited data attesting to its effectiveness for this purpose (Allen et al 2009;Tenneij and Koot 2008). Furthermore, and more importantly, the use of restraints produces acute negative emotional arousal in staff that administers it and in individuals with developmental disabilities that are subjected to it (Hawkins et al 2005;Heyvaert et al 2014b). Staff typically feel anxious, fearful of getting injured, distressed, and other psychological sequelae, and the individuals with intellectual disabilities feel sad, angry, anxious, and fearful (Mérineau-Côté and Morin 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Lydon, Healy, O'Reilly, & McCoy, 2013), response blocking and protective equipment (cf. Heyvaert, Saenen, Maes, & Onghena, 2014), and response cost, timeout or other punishment procedure (cf. Lydon, Healy, Moran, & Foody, 2015).…”
Section: Treatment Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%