2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2009.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review of sleeve gastrectomy as staging and primary bariatric procedure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
268
1
23

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 505 publications
(304 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
12
268
1
23
Order By: Relevance
“…8 We had no sleeve stenosis or death in our series. Three (1.8%) patients underwent surgical reintervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…8 We had no sleeve stenosis or death in our series. Three (1.8%) patients underwent surgical reintervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…8 We are aware of concerns with reporting weight loss as EWL using a BMI of 25 as maximum ideal weight, but our study population was a fairly homogeneous group. 11,12 Excess weight loss is also commonly used, and we were therefore better able to compare our results with those in the published literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Postoperative complications of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy are relatively rare and vary from 0 % to 29 % (mean 11 %) with 0.3 % mortality (1,7,8,9). Perioperative minor complications have an overall incidence of 11 % and major surgical complications 5% in large series (10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays it has been accepted as a definitive stand-alone procedure due to the excellent results in terms of excess weight loss (%EWL) and control of comorbidities, with significant 3 and 5-year experiences that justify this recommendation [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%