Systematic review of the applications of three‐dimensional printing in colorectal surgery

Abstract

Aim Three‐dimensional (3D) printing has been recognized as a revolutionary technological innovation that has benefitted numerous disciplines, including medicine. The present systematic review aimed to demonstrate the current applications of 3D printing in colorectal surgery along with the limitations and potential future applications of this innovation. Method A PRISMA‐compliant systematic literature search of studies that applied 3D printing in colorectal surgery in the period from January 1990 to July 2018 was conducted. Electronic databases including PubMed/Medline, Scopus and the Cochrane Library were searched. All full‐text original articles were eligible for inclusion. Results Nine studies including 58 patients with a median age of 60.7 years were reviewed. The studies assessed 3D printing in patients with planned stoma construction, colon cancer with liver metastasis, right colon cancer, rectal cancer, intractable constipation and anal fistula. The applications of 3D printing were classified into three categories: patient education, preoperative planning and evaluation of response of colorectal liver metastasis to chemotherapy. 3D printed models aided in planning resection of colorectal liver metastasis, facilitating D3 lymphadenectomy in complete mesocolic excision, improving the understanding of pelvic anatomy in laparoscopic rectal cancer treatment, guiding electrode implantation in sacral neuromodulation for intractable constipation, and elucidating the morphology of anal fistula tract and anal sphincter muscles. Conclusion Colorectal surgery may benefit from 3D printing in enhancing patient education before stoma construction, preoperative planning and evaluation of the response of liver metastasis to chemotherapy using 3D ultrasonography.

Evaluation of the SYNAPSE VINCENT for lateral lymph node dissection in rectal cancer with robotic surgery: a preliminary report

“…In the field of colorectal surgery, laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer has been increasing in recent years due to the widespread use of laparoscopic surgery [6]. Laparoscopy also allows precise manipulation of the surgical field due to the effects of magnification and proximity vision.…”

Facilitating the Adoption and Evolution of Digital Technologies Through Re-conceptualization

“…Interdepartmentalization not only stimulates generativity (creating value), but also increases the size of the patient subgroup (delivering more value), thus enabling the perceived marginal benefit of installing a small number of 3DP's to rise above their cost. Perceived cost to hospitals has decreased further from a more evolved study of 3DP's benefits, with much change in the tone of systematic reviews from Diment et al ( 12 ) showing an uncertainty of wider application due to lack of non-anecdotal evidence, to Emile and Wexner ( 30 ) amongst others clarifying such uncertainty. Whilst this still may not communicate much financial value, based on reports from medical professionals, it communicates clinical efficacy to surrounding medical professionals, reducing “role constrained learning” and decreasing the projected costs of organizational resistance, as well as improving hospital reputation.…”

Anatomical Engineering and 3D Printing for Surgery and Medical Devices: International Review and Future Exponential Innovations

“…The use of 3DP in colorectal surgery has also impacted the treatment at many levels. For example, the use of individualized models of stomas in order to educate patients and find the right fit of ostomy bags in patients with difficult abdominal wall anatomy [ 154 , 155 ][ 17 , 18 ]. With regard to preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance for laparoscopic resection of liver metastases due to colorectal cancer, it is evidenced in the review done by Emile and Wexner that 3D models were supportive, especially in those tumors that were not palpable or recognized by intraoperative ultrasonography, as well as described in by Witowski et al, where obtained that the patients presented a decrease in postoperative complications, being considered a cost-effective technique [ 154 , 156 , 157 ].…”